Why are tanks out of the mtea/ why do people believe this?
I realize that tanks are still in the game but only the jungling tanks or support ones. I don't understand why in ranked someone hasta QQ if someone still plays a lane tank. My solo top
|
Quote |
PM |
+Rep
by tehAsian
» February 22, 2012 4:38pm |
Report
PURE tanks are out of the meta. Pre-buff |
tehAsian <Editor> Prominent (81) Posts: 1010 Joined: 2011-07-20 IGN: tehAsian on NA View My Blog |
|
tehAsian wrote:
PURE tanks are out of the meta.
Remember to +Rep me if you think I deserve it.
Check out my guides! ![]() ![]() ![]() Thanks to jhoijhoi for the stamps! |
PsiGuard <Veteran> Distinguished (479) Posts: 2971 Joined: 2011-06-26 IGN: PsiGuard on NA View My Blog |
|
I don't really agree that |
albableat <Scout> Prominent (113) Posts: 757 Joined: 2011-10-25 IGN: albableat on NA View My Blog |
|
tehAsian wrote:
There was a discussion about this somewhere sometime ago. The meta right now is all about damage. A dps can still kill a full tank in about 5 seconds, so why bother with building completely defensive when you can just outright kill them? Hey that was totally almost exactly what I said. :P Pure tanks that deal no damage but take a lot are out of favour for this reason. Much better to get an offtank who can take some beating and stands a chance of killing the AD carry before dying. Canoas wrote:
No dude, you're the ones in the wrong, not us. If someone has a fetish he should keep it for himself instead of advertising it and using avatars and signatures to show it. You don't see foot fetishists using feet avatars and feet signatures. You don't see bondage fetishists using bondage avatars and bondage signatures. Why do you use your pony avatars and pony signatures?
|
Luther3000 <Veteran> Distinguished (245) Posts: 4382 Joined: 2011-06-24 IGN: Luther3000 on EUW |
|
^that's where I got it from~ |
tehAsian <Editor> Prominent (81) Posts: 1010 Joined: 2011-07-20 IGN: tehAsian on NA View My Blog |
|
I disagree, pure tanks (granted they need cc to do what im about to say) are still usefull, for example full tank please hit the plus rep button :) thank you, have fun and keep building
NOTE: I do also review guides upon request |
sn0wwarrior Prominent (69) Posts: 263 Joined: 2011-05-09 IGN: sn0wwarrior on NA View My Blog |
|
tehAsian wrote:
@PsiGuard I meant pure tanks who don't do damage, 'pure' meaning just taking damage, nothing more. Technically what your describing is a soak (not a common term, but I've heard it used to reference this role), which is closer to sn0wwarrior wrote:
for example full tank
He's really not. Tanky support Alistar is viable because he's not very item dependant and can disrupt fights with just some CDR and survivability. He also brings some nice CC and lane sustain to an AD carry. AP Alistar works because he still has a lot of burst potential even after his nerf. He's very difficult to kill and can fill a tank-type role while still dealing huge amounts of damage to squishies. AD Alistar is a newer variant I've seen, usually in jungle. He actually has a very high base damage for Tank Alistar is something that I have never believed to be viable, never seen played at a professional level and never considered as an alternative to better tanks. He already gets a lot of tankiness from his ultimate, he requires a solo lane in order to farm up enough gold to buy expensive tank items, he's very cooldown dependant, he doesn't have much damage output without gearing for it and he basically becomes a big unkillable blob who annoys people every 10 seconds in team fights. In fact, tank Alistar and support Alistar can do the EXACT SAME THING, only tank Alistar needs solo lane farm and support Ali doesn't. If you want to prove me wrong, explain to me how full tank Alistar is in any way superior to other tanks, how he can win a solo lane and how he isn't simply ignored in team fights OR show me some pro games with an Alistar building full survivability and still having a significant impact on his team's success compared to another tank or a support Alistar. Unless you can do that, I'm convinced that he is "unviable" as a tank.
Remember to +Rep me if you think I deserve it.
Check out my guides! ![]() ![]() ![]() Thanks to jhoijhoi for the stamps! |
PsiGuard <Veteran> Distinguished (479) Posts: 2971 Joined: 2011-06-26 IGN: PsiGuard on NA View My Blog |
|
I don't agree with Moakai, cuz even without some decent ap, he can still do some damage. Code:
Moakai
Size does matter Teemo... OM NOM NOM NOM NOM NOM NOM...!
|
DarkVoidShadow Unremarkable (7) Posts: 35 Joined: 2011-09-04 IGN: DarkVoidShadow on EUW View My Blog |
|
DarkVoidShadow wrote:
I don't agree with Moakai, cuz even without some decent ap, he can still do some damage. There is no champion that doesn't deal some damage. Maokai generally doesn't gear much for it. Like I said earlier, I mentioned him because he's picked for his CC and ult, not damage output. Galio's in there too, but he can deal quite a bit of damage. That's not why you want him on a team though, you want his lane presence and ult.
Remember to +Rep me if you think I deserve it.
Check out my guides! ![]() ![]() ![]() Thanks to jhoijhoi for the stamps! |
PsiGuard <Veteran> Distinguished (479) Posts: 2971 Joined: 2011-06-26 IGN: PsiGuard on NA View My Blog |
|
PsiGuard wrote:
There is no champion that doesn't deal some damage. Maokai generally doesn't gear much for it. Like I said earlier, I mentioned him because he's picked for his CC and ult, not damage output. Galio's in there too, but he can deal quite a bit of damage. That's not why you want him on a team though, you want his lane presence and ult. Yeah, yu are totaly right Size does matter Teemo... OM NOM NOM NOM NOM NOM NOM...!
|
DarkVoidShadow Unremarkable (7) Posts: 35 Joined: 2011-09-04 IGN: DarkVoidShadow on EUW View My Blog |