Soraka Build Guide : Of the Stars: Support Soraka :: League of Legends Strategy Builds

1

(52) |

wrote:

Cheatsheet:

Summoner Spells - Fine. I always juggle between and and pick according to enemy matchups.

Runes - Also pretty standard.

Masteries - is pretty flexible in terms of the masteries she can take, but I suppose what you have is a good default page to fall back on. I would rather that 1 point go into rather than .

Items - This is where I have the most issue (and also the most trouble). For a start, I think or is core on . I think your choices also lack and as possible choices. I don't consider core, either. I also think the formatting of the items is a tad bit messy - other than starting items and core, it seems a little confusing as to what to build next.

Skill Sequence - Good job.

Written Content:

The written section brings much more clarity than before in the cheat-sheet. There's still the issues that I mentioned above. I'm very hesitant to upvote your guide, because it doesn't seem as if you have much experience playing in comparison to your guide. Most of the information is there, but you just need to be more certain on your item choices in particular.

Verdict:

A decent attempt, but not convincing enough, I feel, as a guide to to warrant an upvote. Structuring is a little messy at times and to be honest, if I was reading this as a learner of , I wouldn't really know what to build and when. I think a little more experience into may be necessary.

I honestly don't think or are any good tbh. They're really fillers, and that one point could go in as well.

I shifted the cheat sheet around a bit, but to be honest, I'm not 100% sure where you're getting at. I use the standard Start|Early Gane|Core|Finishing Items|Enchants format which I use in most of my guides. I'll try to fix the format *sobbing* That format wasn't easy to make, and work on the itemization section altogether in time.

I think that if you're itemizing for damage, really should be the way to go (though I did change the extra offensive and defensive cores to and respectively). You don't really benefit from AP builds on because of her poor AP scalings on , but it goes really well with MPen, which means in turn, . is really situational because it lacks defensive properties, and the passive won't really be any good if the enemy never falls below 40% in health.

I honestly have more experience with than . Marksmen are just more rigid and standard buildwise honestly. They're easy enough in building in comparison to other roles. It's just {//}{/} 21/9/0. That works with literally pretty much every marksman. Supports, included, are a lot more flexible.

In any case, thanks for the review. I'll try to work on the Itemization section over time.

1

(400) |

Sirell's Review Service

Cheatsheet:

Summoner Spells - Fine. I always juggle between and and pick according to enemy matchups.

Runes - Also pretty standard.

Masteries - is pretty flexible in terms of the masteries she can take, but I suppose what you have is a good default page to fall back on. I would rather that 1 point go into rather than .

Items - This is where I have the most issue (and also the most trouble). For a start, I think or is core on . I think your choices also lack and as possible choices. I don't consider core, either. I also think the formatting of the items is a tad bit messy - other than starting items and core, it seems a little confusing as to what to build next.

Skill Sequence - Good job.

Written Content:

The written section brings much more clarity than before in the cheat-sheet. There's still the issues that I mentioned above. I'm very hesitant to upvote your guide, because it doesn't seem as if you have much experience playing in comparison to your guide. Most of the information is there, but you just need to be more certain on your item choices in particular.

Verdict:

A decent attempt, but not convincing enough, I feel, as a guide to to warrant an upvote. Structuring is a little messy at times and to be honest, if I was reading this as a learner of , I wouldn't really know what to build and when. I think a little more experience into may be necessary.

1

(34) |

Thanks!

1

(52) |

wrote:

Do you think is viable? It's quite expensive for a support, but she can proc its passive easily with .

It's highly situational, but yes, I think it's viable. In honesty though, you won't find yourself autoattacking very much on because her AA animation is terrible.

1

(16) |

Do you think is viable? It's quite expensive for a support, but she can proc its passive easily with .

1

(569) |

here you go c:

1

(52) |

wrote:

I srsly wanna give you the reward of the "Best Guide Designer" ._. You should really deserve that Reward Spongy :o BTW, whats your ambition/Job? O.o Artist? Designer? :p

Thank you. I'd like to be an artist/designer.

wrote:

Just include trinkets and when to change to and you've earned yourself an upvote :p It'd be the first one in 3 weeks :o

I assume you meant in the cheat sheet. It's noted in the guide. In any case, I added it to the cheat sheet. Thank you for pointing it out.

1

(569) |

Just include trinkets and when to change to and you've earned yourself an upvote :p It'd be the first one in 3 weeks :o

1

(74) |

I srsly wanna give you the reward of the "Best Guide Designer" ._. You should really deserve that Reward Spongy :o BTW, whats your ambition/Job? O.o Artist? Designer? :p

1

(52) |

This guide has received a massive update.
Enjoy

1

(52) |

wrote:

Cheatsheet: 15/20

7/10 item picks + structure
You call it a defensive path but it certainly isn't without start which I didn't see mention of in the build. Also, two builds is just pretty useless because for people like me (dyslexic) the differences are rather hard to notice between builds. You should just combine these two and call the item builds "If you want damage" and "If you want survivability" etc.

8/10 the rest
I'd take Q>W>E>W>Q>R in the early game because I really like the armor and heal on and if they have people who can go hard on you early on (, etc.) it will be pretty useful. The difference between lvl 1 and lvl 2 is pretty huge if you ask me (in the early game).

I prefer over because that one second can make a difference.

Structure + coding: 14/15

9/10 uses of overviews, schemes and other uses of structure
I really like the look of it. The guide looks clear but also provides a lot of information. This is the reason why I gave you 9points in this section. I disagree with the chapter order. Imo synergy and counters should be after things like masteries, runes etc. because they are chosen before the game most of the time while synergies and counters only matter in the champion select.

5/5 uses of coding
^

Content: 49/50

24/25 Full Build Quality Explanation
On the explanation; You get it immediately after you get because with you can place max amount of wards already thus making useless. I couldn't see any other mistakes with a quick look so don't disappoint me.

20/20 Tactical Quality Explanation
With a quick look - everything looks fine. I hope there isn't anything that I missed because then I'd give you too many points.

5/5 Quantity content
There is a lot of information in a compact guide. I really like how you can explain so much without having walls of text.

Bonus: 10/10

5/5 bonus chapters (matchups and synergy chapters)

5/5 attitude towards the readers (wants to improve)

0/0 Comment to vote

Result:

Path of the Saint (9½)

See the rating system number thingy over here

+Rep is always appreciated ;)

Thank you so much for the feedback! I will update my guide over the weekend. I made the two cheat sheets because building offensively and defensively are pretty different earlier on. In any case, I will update my guide to some of your suggestions. I agree with the occasional QWEWQR, but I honestly don't get what the big deal is with . There's never really been a time where I had a clutch recall or where the one second made much of a difference. I'm personally a fan of MS over this, but I'll consider it.

1

(569) |

Cheatsheet: 15/20

7/10 item picks + structure
You call it a defensive path but it certainly isn't without start which I didn't see mention of in the build. Also, two builds is just pretty useless because for people like me (dyslexic) the differences are rather hard to notice between builds. You should just combine these two and call the item builds "If you want damage" and "If you want survivability" etc.

8/10 the rest
I'd take Q>W>E>W>Q>R in the early game because I really like the armor and heal on and if they have people who can go hard on you early on (, etc.) it will be pretty useful. The difference between lvl 1 and lvl 2 is pretty huge if you ask me (in the early game).

I prefer over because that one second can make a difference.

Structure + coding: 14/15

9/10 uses of overviews, schemes and other uses of structure
I really like the look of it. The guide looks clear but also provides a lot of information. This is the reason why I gave you 9points in this section. I disagree with the chapter order. Imo synergy and counters should be after things like masteries, runes etc. because they are chosen before the game most of the time while synergies and counters only matter in the champion select.

5/5 uses of coding
^

Content: 49/50

24/25 Full Build Quality Explanation
On the explanation; You get it immediately after you get because with you can place max amount of wards already thus making useless. I couldn't see any other mistakes with a quick look so don't disappoint me.

20/20 Tactical Quality Explanation
With a quick look - everything looks fine. I hope there isn't anything that I missed because then I'd give you too many points.

5/5 Quantity content
There is a lot of information in a compact guide. I really like how you can explain so much without having walls of text.

Bonus: 10/10

5/5 bonus chapters (matchups and synergy chapters)

5/5 attitude towards the readers (wants to improve)

0/0 Comment to vote

Result:

Path of the Saint (9½)