|
|
|
|
I don't really know why you'd bother building hybrid on-hit when AD pretty much does the same thing except better.
|
Luther3000 <Inhouse Addict>
|
||||||
|
You can say what you want. It doesn't change the fact that it works lol. I'd say it's even more effective at getting you ahead than a straight up AD build. In my experience at least it definitely is. I played this build against an AD kayle and wrecked her. I've also played both builds and I do better with the on hit. So go on pretending it's a bad build. It doesn't matter to me one bit.
|
|
|
I play hybrid because she does it so well, so effortlessly.
Personal habitual activites? Utilizing gargantuan idioms to fabricate intelligence.
"It's a colloquial shorthand that means the paradigm exists because of how the game works mechanically. Hence, "the Meta." Stop being a useless pedant." - PlayGooYa |
|
|
MyRepublic wrote:
You can say what you want. It doesn't change the fact that it works lol. I'd say it's even more effective at getting you ahead than a straight up AD build. In my experience at least it definitely is. I played this build against an AD kayle and wrecked her. I've also played both builds and I do better with the on hit. So go on pretending it's a bad build. It doesn't matter to me one bit. Ofc it works. But then again I played AD lux against Guardsman and won is it viable on a serious lvl? Or are there better options - yes. I think they just try to help since it's obvious that a full AD kayle with IE etc. will just shred any hybrid kayle. If she lost to you, you somehow got ahead or she jsut played worse than you.
|
|
|
Actually, AD Kayle is more effective only because
And, of course, her basic attacks are stronger. Personal habitual activites? Utilizing gargantuan idioms to fabricate intelligence.
"It's a colloquial shorthand that means the paradigm exists because of how the game works mechanically. Hence, "the Meta." Stop being a useless pedant." - PlayGooYa |
|
|
koksei wrote:
is it viable on a serious lvl? No. But he's low level. At low level on hit is really good. It gives you an amazing early game which is what most low level games are defined by. That's why I put it on the "beginner friendly kayle" post. If it had said "high level play kayle" I'd have said go for the AD build because at high levels that works better. At lower levels though on hit is the way to go in my opinion. Unless you get fed early and can get an IE really early. |
|
|
guinsoos madreds are all early game items that are way way better early game.
however, he will fall off hard if you build these. Not taking an opinion or stance, just saying. Both are used, it just depends on your team and if you trust them to feed them and have them carry you.
yolo, teemo to strong in low elo
|
|
|
When you get guinsoo's, if all went well, you will immediately notice the absurd damage you're dealing out of nowhere. AD carry items will take longer to take effect.
So really, you can sell it later, but it's early boost is nothing to disconsider on Kayle.
Thanks Icecreamy for the Valentine's sig! :>
|
|
|
FalseoGod wrote:
When you get guinsoo's, if all went well, you will immediately notice the absurd damage you're dealing out of nowhere. AD carry items will take longer to take effect. So really, you can sell it later, but it's early boost is nothing to disconsider on Kayle. Same reason I get malady but you get the effect sooner. I guess you could skip malady and go straight for a guinoo's, but I'm much too lazy to try that out. |
|







You level Q first, in any lane. E is more of her utility spell, which is nice to have but barely worth to level.