Fiora Build Guide : Yamikaze's Fiora Guide :: League of Legends Strategy Builds

2

(1) |

Yami you can't say you are going to update daily and have updated it more than a week ago. Cmon man :(

1

|

Pls update the crit build pls

2

|

Another victory by house Laurent.

1

|

Hi there, love ur guide. But could u maybe explain the finishing items like steraks etc., when u buy what and why.
Would be really nice especially for newer players like me.
Thanks

2

(5) |

I've seen a lot of transcendence and gathering storm, but forgotten project recommends bone plating and overgrowth. Which one is better? Bone plating and overgrowth give more livability. While transcendence gives CDR, which is great for her abilities. Also, gathering storm gives more scaling and more power late game, giving her great dualing potential at around 20 or 30 mins, which is great for low elo, since games last longer. At around 20 mins, the sorcery runes give you around 756 gold of stats, while the resolve runes give you something i don't know. Both seem really good, but which is better?

1

|

Great Guide, i would love to see a resolve second tree tho

2

|

Hello,I really like Blade of the Ruined King on Fiora rather than Ravenous Hydra. Can you try it aswell? With new BotRK, you start destroying everything after botrk and trinity. Can you add a build like this too?

2

(118) |

Hi.
As I always have mid-late game mana problems... sometimes I get Blue buff when I'm fed but I'd like to know what's your suggestion to solve mana hungry problems. I've been thinking of using over or over . Which one do you think is better?

1

|

Ty for a great guide! But can you add to this guide "Resolve" runes page please?

1

|

Thank you for good guide, very helpfull :)

1

|

if im againts garen what should i must to do?
i mean i was vs him once allthough i played so safe still i could not win line at all since jg rolers totally forgot we have a top line XD

2

(41) |

Oh, I wanted opinions on rune setups:

Opinions on greater mark of armor penetration?
Opinions on going for 3 Greater Quintessence of Attack Damage instead of attack speed?

Also I feel like the matchup difficulty for Quinn and Kayle should be swapped. I find it easy to zone if you just reset the vital points and constantly use Q to proc it, and then W if she tries to E you. Kayle is a different story.

2

(5) |

Dear MrMad2000,

Thank you for checking out my guide, I hope you learned a new thing or two from it.

As for my opinions, for greater mark of armor penetration, I feel that it gives up way too much early game trading power. Assume that the enemy has 40 armor at level 1, and you use armor penetration runes, the enemy will take about 77% damage from you. Without armor penetration runes, the enemy will take about 71% damage, which is 6% less. However, if you take 9 AD runes, you will hit 9 AD damage more per auto attack, as well as about 10 damage more from your , which is more than the 6% damage assuming that you have 70 AD at the start and your Q deals 80 damage. is actually worth more than greater mark of armor penetration, especially during the early game stage where you should make yourself as strong as possible to avoid losing the laning phase.

As for , I understand that it is more of a preference for people to go attack speed for easier CS-ing and easier vital procs. However, there is nothing wrong with going , because of 's high scalings. But allows you to stack your higher and has more raw damage because it multiplies your auto attack damage by 14% instead of adding a fixed 8 AD damage. But I do recommend people go attack speed rather than attack damage because it has more room for error.

As for and , the reason that I put as a higher threat than is that, has an escape ability and higher mobility than . can easily stay out of range with her , which is a hard ability to parry, especially if she is very close to you, while harrassing you with her auto attack which can be enhanced by her passive. But for , if you manage to her Q, which is an easier skill to parry, she becomes very vulnerable as she does not have any escape abilities except for a brief speed buff.

If they managed to get ahead, has more options than in terms of snowballing and shutting you down. can easily freeze a lane if the minions are pushed towards her, while 's auto attack is an area of effect damage. When they try to freeze, you can pressure and bait her to use her E easily, which will push the lane when she goes for CS, but you cannot do that with . Also, has an ult that is very useful for snowballing, because of the immense movement speed buff, she can easily chase you and other allies down and kill them easily if she gets ahead. However, does not have the mobility, and cannot snowball as hard, which makes her easier to shut down with a 3-men dive or just a simple gank.

I hope that I have replied you well, if you have any other questions, feel free to ask.

Aegis EnGarde

2

(41) |

Quote from Aegis Engarde

wrote:

Dear MrMad2000,

Thank you for checking out my guide, I hope you learned a new thing or two from it.

As for my opinions, for greater mark of armor penetration, I feel that it gives up way too much early game trading power. Assume that the enemy has 40 armor at level 1, and you use armor penetration runes, the enemy will take about 77% damage from you. Without armor penetration runes, the enemy will take about 71% damage, which is 6% less. However, if you take 9 AD runes, you will hit 9 AD damage more per auto attack, as well as about 10 damage more from your , which is more than the 6% damage assuming that you have 70 AD at the start and your Q deals 80 damage. is actually worth more than greater mark of armor penetration, especially during the early game stage where you should make yourself as strong as possible to avoid losing the laning phase.

As for , I understand that it is more of a preference for people to go attack speed for easier CS-ing and easier vital procs. However, there is nothing wrong with going , because of 's high scalings. But allows you to stack your higher and has more raw damage because it multiplies your auto attack damage by 14% instead of adding a fixed 8 AD damage. But I do recommend people go attack speed rather than attack damage because it has more room for error.

As for and , the reason that I put as a higher threat than is that, has an escape ability and higher mobility than . can easily stay out of range with her , which is a hard ability to parry, especially if she is very close to you, while harrassing you with her auto attack which can be enhanced by her passive. But for , if you manage to her Q, which is an easier skill to parry, she becomes very vulnerable as she does not have any escape abilities except for a brief speed buff.

If they managed to get ahead, has more options than in terms of snowballing and shutting you down. can easily freeze a lane if the minions are pushed towards her, while 's auto attack is an area of effect damage. When they try to freeze, you can pressure and bait her to use her E easily, which will push the lane when she goes for CS, but you cannot do that with . Also, has an ult that is very useful for snowballing, because of the immense movement speed buff, she can easily chase you and other allies down and kill them easily if she gets ahead. However, does not have the mobility, and cannot snowball as hard, which makes her easier to shut down with a 3-men dive or just a simple gank.

I hope that I have replied you well, if you have any other questions, feel free to ask.

Aegis EnGarde

Thank you for the response. I was hoping that when you get enough time you could expand the matchups and just write a short sentence or two stating the win conditions. I don't have enough experience playing top lane and I don't know how difficult the matchups are, so I'm struggling to snowball and transition into teamfights well for now. But every game I play I'm learning a little more which is good. ^-^

(>^-^)>

Yamikaze's Fiora Guide

Yamikaze's Fiora Guide

New Comment

League of Legends Champions: