Getting both and Gears of War 3....Why the **** should anyone have to choose? They're both FPSs BOTH have raging little ****tards who haven't had their balls drop. One has destructible cover; which is nice but when you've been knocking down buildings since Bad Company it gets repetative. They'll have to pull something amazing out of their *** to make it feel better than it did before, otherwise it isn't worth the mechanic they've centered their last 2 Battle Fields around.
MW3 No activision? FINALLY A HORDE MODE? Same great multiplayer experience I've been experiencing since Call of Duty came to the 360? SOLD!!!!!
Both franchises offer the EXACT same thing, an FPS to play with friends. Both go about their death n' destructiin in distinctive (although quite similar ways). People who choose one over the other for whatever reason are just biased.
Both franchises offer solid FPS experiences
Awesome community support and enough DLC to sink a submarine
Interesting experiences unlike that of pre-360/PS3 fps games.
Both will have screaming children pissed off because I killed them in a ridiculous manner and proceeded to Tbag them from head to toe...Rinse repeat.
MW3 No activision? FINALLY A HORDE MODE? Same great multiplayer experience I've been experiencing since Call of Duty came to the 360? SOLD!!!!!
Both franchises offer the EXACT same thing, an FPS to play with friends. Both go about their death n' destructiin in distinctive (although quite similar ways). People who choose one over the other for whatever reason are just biased.
Both franchises offer solid FPS experiences
Awesome community support and enough DLC to sink a submarine
Interesting experiences unlike that of pre-360/PS3 fps games.
Both will have screaming children pissed off because I killed them in a ridiculous manner and proceeded to Tbag them from head to toe...Rinse repeat.
You need to log in before commenting.
<Member>