Click to open network menu
Join or Log In
Mobafire logo

Join the leading League of Legends community. Create and share Champion Guides and Builds.

Create an MFN Account






Or

's Forum Avatar

20 minute surrendering...

Creator: Mazuran September 14, 2011 2:18am
1 2 3
Mazuran
<Member>
Mazuran's Forum Avatar
Show more awards
Posts:
250
Joined:
Aug 13th, 2011
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep September 14, 2011 2:18am | Report
The other day, I had a terrible game. I went 1/6/0 in the first 10 minutes. Bottom lane did about the same. Mid RQ, followed by the two guys on bottom lane. Making the game a 2v5...
I had to wait about 5 minutes before we could start a surrender vote. Getting bored and increasingly more pissed off.

So I got thinking... Why is the surrender timer set at 20mins anyway? Could you make it scale with how many people have left the game?

What do you lot think?
GLitcH
<Member>
GLitcH's Forum Avatar
Posts:
7
Joined:
Sep 12th, 2011
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep September 14, 2011 2:22am | Report
Well I think RIOT likes to give the players enough time to change things around. I had a score of 3/7/0 in the first 10 minutes of a game, then we pretty much turned around and started to push hardcore and my score ended up as 11/9/5. So thats my 2 cents worth.
Keels
<Editor>
Keels's Forum Avatar
Posts:
832
Joined:
Apr 17th, 2011
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep September 14, 2011 2:28am | Report
So people won't just troll surrender to waste people's time without wasting their own.

Idk
/thread

I don't care about my rep, but you can +rep if you want to.
NicknameMy
<Editor>
NicknameMy's Forum Avatar
Show more awards
Posts:
6068
Joined:
Apr 27th, 2011
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep September 14, 2011 2:45am | Report
They should remove surrendering. That cost many people the game, which they can turn around.
He is gonna kill you!!!
Keels
<Editor>
Keels's Forum Avatar
Posts:
832
Joined:
Apr 17th, 2011
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep September 14, 2011 3:14am | Report
Um. No they shouldn't. It's their choice to surrender, thereby it's not "costing them the game". It's entirely up to them
It's embarrassing and unfair to have to play through a game that everyone knows is lost, or because of a leaver or AFK.
Think before you post.

I don't care about my rep, but you can +rep if you want to.
caucheka
<Veteran>
caucheka's Forum Avatar
Show more awards
Posts:
8290
Joined:
May 18th, 2010
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep September 14, 2011 3:16am | Report
both of you have a point but i think keels came off a little bit harsh..
I like things that make me feel stupid. - Ken Levine
Keels
<Editor>
Keels's Forum Avatar
Posts:
832
Joined:
Apr 17th, 2011
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep September 14, 2011 3:19am | Report
The last part, I know.
But if a majority of the team doesn't think you were going to win, then they're going to lose anyway, probably.
Eliminating the option is not smart.
People will grief and feed to make it end faster.

I don't care about my rep, but you can +rep if you want to.
caucheka
<Veteran>
caucheka's Forum Avatar
Show more awards
Posts:
8290
Joined:
May 18th, 2010
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep September 14, 2011 5:48am | Report
in nicknamemy's defense, i've played a few games where my team continuously voted 3/2 surrender past 20 minutes, yet we still ended up winning in the end.
I like things that make me feel stupid. - Ken Levine
Nighthawk
<Veteran>
Nighthawk's Forum Avatar
Show more awards
Posts:
10094
Joined:
Dec 7th, 2010
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep September 14, 2011 6:05am | Report
I like having surrendering and ****, but if surrender, you shouldn't gain any IP. It's incredibly annoying when I routinely carry games with 1 person who is **** and win, even if the other team is fed and the rest of your team wants to surrender. In 3 v 3 it happens pretty much every game that I go top lane, get fed and bot lane feeds, 15 min and past I get spammed with surrender votes and end up winning the game after I pwn them >.>


Nighthawk wrote: I might not have the most posts but i'm pretty sure I have the most *****.
Searz wrote: ^ QFT
Luther3000
<Sharpshooter>
Luther3000's Forum Avatar
Show more awards
Posts:
8064
Joined:
Jun 24th, 2011
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep September 14, 2011 6:16am | Report
caucheka wrote:

in nicknamemy's defense, i've played a few games where my team continuously voted 3/2 surrender past 20 minutes, yet we still ended up winning in the end.


That's the reason why it requires 4/5 people to vote yes. Let's face it, if four of the five people on your team think the game is completely lost with no chance of winning, it usually is.

The only exception being if you get placed with a four premade of trolls or get four idiots as teammates (which I guess isn't that rare, come to think of it).
1 2 3

You need to log in before commenting.

League of Legends Champions:

Teamfight Tactics Guide