Intel® Core i7-2700K Vs. Intel® Core i7-960 -...

[quote=Temzilla][quote=Searz] Well, if you're ok with spending 60% more money on 10% better performace then go ahead. I'm personally not made of gold though, so I'd go for the better price/performance. [/quote] You don't have to be made of gold to sell your body.[/quote]

[quote=Searz]But laptops have totally different CPUs. They remodel them for laptops and they lose a lot of power.[/quote]

[quote=Searz][quote=Temzilla] You don't have to be made of gold to sell your body.[/quote] True dat.[/quote]

[quote=Scrax]Fair enough. Still.[/quote]

[quote=B-Wong]The chip architecture of the 2500k is different, too (if I'm not mistaken).[/quote]

[quote=Searz]I think you're mistaken. The 2500 and 2600 are pretty much the same cpu, just that 2600 has hyperthreading and overclocks ~5% better than 2500, maybe (5% really is NOTHING though..). Also; Hyperthreading won't matter in most applications.[/quote]

[quote=B-Wong][quote=Searz] I think you're mistaken. The 2500 and 2600 are pretty much the same cpu, just that 2600 has hyperthreading and overclocks ~5% better than 2500, maybe (5% really is NOTHING though..). Also; Hyperthreading won't matter in most applications. [/quote] I meant compared to laptop i5s.[/quote]

[quote=Searz]Oh yea. That's probably true.[/quote]