But laptops have totally different CPUs. They remodel them for laptops and they lose a lot of power.
"every now and again you come across a game that has so little emotional connection to who you are that you end up standing there, gazing at the screen and saying "I'm just pressing buttons and my life has no meaning,"" - Colin Campbell
Temzilla wrote:
You don't have to be made of gold to sell your body.
True dat.
"Games may not be art, but this one did wonderful things to my ****." - Roger Ebert
"I AM PRETTY SURE THIS MANGA IS VIOLATING SOME LAWS ABOUT CHILD PORNOGRAPHY
I CANNOT GET ENOUGH
****" - mencretnas, on Gigantomakhia
"I AM PRETTY SURE THIS MANGA IS VIOLATING SOME LAWS ABOUT CHILD PORNOGRAPHY
I CANNOT GET ENOUGH
****" - mencretnas, on Gigantomakhia
I think you're mistaken.
The 2500 and 2600 are pretty much the same cpu, just that 2600 has hyperthreading and overclocks ~5% better than 2500, maybe (5% really is NOTHING though..).
Also; Hyperthreading won't matter in most applications.
The 2500 and 2600 are pretty much the same cpu, just that 2600 has hyperthreading and overclocks ~5% better than 2500, maybe (5% really is NOTHING though..).
Also; Hyperthreading won't matter in most applications.
"Doing something, almost being done, then parents come in and don't let you finish.
Yes, I had a rough childhood." - devdevil
Yes, I had a rough childhood." - devdevil
Searz wrote:
I think you're mistaken.
The 2500 and 2600 are pretty much the same cpu, just that 2600 has hyperthreading and overclocks ~5% better than 2500, maybe (5% really is NOTHING though..).
Also; Hyperthreading won't matter in most applications.
I meant compared to laptop i5s.
You need to log in before commenting.
Well, if you're ok with spending 60% more money on 10% better performace then go ahead.
I'm personally not made of gold though, so I'd go for the better price/performance.
You don't have to be made of gold to sell your body.