Bludes wrote:
what's so special? It looks like a HTC..
Huh? O.o
What do you mean? I don't think the OS looks anything like HTC's sense UI.
Mind providing examples? Because I'm pretty sure you're just tripping or have eye problems if that's what you think.
"I sexually Identify as an Attack Helicopter. Ever since I was a boy I dreamed of soaring over the oilfields dropping hot sticky loads on disgusting foreigners. People say to me that a person being a helicopter is Impossible and I’m ****ing ******ed but I don’t care, I’m beautiful. I’m having a plastic surgeon install rotary blades, 30 mm cannons and AMG-114 Hellfire missiles on my body. From now on I want you guys to call me “Apache†and respect my right to kill from above and kill needlessly. If you can’t accept me you’re a heliphobe and need to check your vehicle privilege. Thank you for being so understanding." - Guuse
"uh, I identify as counterstrike and I find this globally offensive" - ???
"uh, I identify as counterstrike and I find this globally offensive" - ???
You need to log in before commenting.
To me it seems convoluted and overly complicated. Having a gesture-based interface is not a problem, but when you have to swipe from the bottom and select the right alternative to answer a call then I think it is a problem. There's easily enough space to just display buttons or a gesture pattern (like slide to answer). The fact that they don't leads me to believe that the majority of the interface is unintuitive and convoluted.
I will however commend them on the aesthetic of the OS, because OH MY GOD DOES IT LOOK GOOD. Sleek doesn't even cut it.
That said, I'm happy that there is more competition for Android, because complete dominance can cause problems.