Commented
Posted a Comment: Jun 4th, 2012
"{quote}"
Commented
Posted a Comment: Jun 4th, 2012
"
HAAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHH"
Commented
Posted a Comment: Jun 4th, 2012
"
Text is better. Lighting and background need some work.
lol@cool."
Commented
Posted a Comment: Jun 4th, 2012
"{quote}"
Commented
Posted a Comment: Jun 2nd, 2012
"I guess it's a forum thing that if you like what someone's wearing (sig wise), then you ask for it or at least the PSD so you can change it up a bit. It does bother me slightly when I see two people with the same sig though I don't know why it does."
Commented
Posted a Comment: Jun 1st, 2012
"Questionable ethics using a sig that someone is already using?"
Commented
Posted a Comment: May 31st, 2012
"
Only one solution then."
Commented
Posted a Comment: May 31st, 2012
"Awesome. He's ignored me. Now I can say what I really think.
I think he's being overly sensitive to the fact that I called his taste monotonic based off the fact he's sticking to a 2 shade stock.
Also, he called me a douche bag before I pointed out he started flaming.
Nowhere have I flamed "
Commented
Posted a Comment: May 31st, 2012
"First - these points are bulleted. They are ordered. And it's "balant".
1) Proceeds to flame. Ad hominem argumentation.
So directly insulting me and calling me "pathetic", a "rager", and assuming I have a "disorder riddled life" isn't flame and ad homine"
Commented
Posted a Comment: May 31st, 2012
"lol you have not seen my arrogance - this? This is me playing nice."
