Official QQ Thread

[quote=DuffTime][quote=MissMaw] Now i can't get BEE BO DEEP DAT DEY BA DOOO DOOOOO. DEE DO DEEP BAP DEY BOP DOOOO out of my head. [/quote] *Flexxxxxxxxxxxxxxx* Oh BTW Lux is just plain not as good when compared to most AP champs. Inferrrriorrrrrr. :P I think her only place is with Leona in the bot lane. I've seen that lane dunk super hard.[/quote]

[quote=Wintermond]our mid pix lux vs morde. wtf.[/quote]

[quote=JEFFY40HANDS]in the way that Orianna drops into a more supportive champ late game?[/quote]

[quote=JEFFY40HANDS][quote=Wintermond] our mid pix lux vs morde. wtf. [/quote] dat range bra it'll be k....Or not[/quote]

[quote=The_Nameless_Bard]I meant is it really important to keep talking about it? We disagree and it's not important in the grand scheme of things. and trust me when I say, if I ever have to jungle in a game with you...you'd better hope I pick Irelia, Nidalee, or Shen because otherwise I'm going to feed. Player skill matters too, because no matter how much better of a jungler Skarner is...I'm absolutely terrible with him.[/quote]

[quote=DuffTime]I feel as though you guys aren't even really disagreeing, but getting hung up on opposite concepts. I think we all know champs like Skarner and Rammus and whatnot are better junglers than Irelia. The main difference being that Jeffy is stating that anything less than being able to compete with top picks in their respective category, should not be branded "Viable" which I actually fully agree with. Irelia can jungle, I've done it before, but it's rather suboptimal. When compared to alternatice junglers, there's really no comparing them.[/quote]

[quote=JEFFY40HANDS]Winner winner chicken dinner[/quote]

[quote=The_Nameless_Bard]my definition of Viability has always been the innate ability for something to work. Irelia's kit does not make her an unviable jungler, the fact that she is completely outclassed does. It appears that my definition of outclassed is Jeffy's definition of Viability.[/quote]

[quote=DuffTime]Pretty much :P And since I'm the type who plays the game to win as opposed to play the game to play a game or have fun, I naturally tend towards Competitive top notch picks = viable xD[/quote]

[quote=The_Nameless_Bard]makes sense. the literal definition of viable is "having a reasonable chance of succeeding" so I suppose I should consider thinking about it differently.[/quote]