This build has been archived and is for historical display only

This build has been archived by the author. They are no longer supporting nor updating this build and it may have become outdated. As such, voting and commenting have been disabled and it no longer appears in regular search results.

We recommend you take a look at this author's other builds.

The Book of Aphelios

Not Updated For Current Season

This guide has not yet been updated for the current season. Please keep this in mind while reading. You can see the most recently updated guides on the browse guides page

Zoe Build Guide by

Vapora Dark In-Depth Mid Zoe Guide 9.22 Season 9

78 6

1,711,349 Views

60 Comments

Zoe Build Guide By Updated on

Support

Guide Discussion (60) More Zoe Guides

New Comment

You need to log in before commenting.

well, this build and runes sucks

(624) |

Well what about it sucks? Cmon work with me baby, how am I meant to fix this if I don't know what's wrong?!

(1) |

When're you going to update the guide with matchups?

(624) |

I don't intend to add matchups to any of my guides.

(1) |

You need to update your Runes section since you're now using domination rather than the biscuit and other thingy.

(4) |

I just finished the first Zoe quest,I think I will play her more often!

broken

(353) |

balanced champ

(1) |

so zoe is op.. nerf incoming in less then month.. btw awesome guide

Good job Vapora! You finally did your own runes and didnt just post Riot premade ones!
Really good job, way to go!

(624) |

Wut, I've always posted my own runes. I have no idea what the Riot premades are.

Well, still it is questionable if all ADCs should use same runes.

Load more comments (1 more replies) →

(624) |

I have different runes from the standard for Kalista + Ezreal and I'll be adding Fleet Footwork to some as the recent buffs have made it good, but almost all ADCs want Precision -> Sorcery. Can't help that it's the best on all of them.

Voted +1

This is really helpful!

(5) |

Voted +1

Thanks for The guide it helped a lot I just started playing her and I loved her :)

(4) |

Voted +1

You wanted a comment, eh? :D

(624) |

zoe main btw

-1

(4) |

Excuse me

but you can't just jump out with a guide and then say that you're a Zoe Main as a defense to the comments and attempting to make the guide trustworthy. Zoe got released like how many days ago? Like almost 1 or 2 days I believe. You're not a Zoe main if you've played her for around one week or two weeks if you got PBE.

It's not possible to understand all the mechanics of a certain champion, the strategies and wise decisions and usage of the strategies on different perspectives and state and position of the game in two lousy weeks or less, even if you're a high Elo player! It takes a while to master/main whatever champion. There are things we haven't discovered/explored yet about Zoe's mechanics/kits etc yet.

The reason I answered was not because the guide or for the person you are.
I simply got irritated and quite disappointed over the fact that you just came out and said that you are a Zoe main from nowhere. I assure you that nobody has become a Zoe Main yet with full confidence, it will take a while to master a champion.

Please, do not take offense, but I'm saying this to you as a reminder to think before you do or write something. Even two or three words can mean so much which you've just written.

Think before you speak.

(624) |

I can't tell if you're serious or memeing. For the record I was memeing, I'm not a Zoe main, it was a joke because she wasn't even released when I commented that, although I had been playing her on PBE.

Load more comments (3 more replies) →

(4) |

Before I get to the point, I'm 110% serious. I did not aim at your records whether if they were good or bad. I was simply aiming by your point of view by saying " zoe main btw ".

You're saying that you were joking about it before she got released, I can accept that.

BUT!

When you're an author of a guide, you want to be serious and not joke about things. Because when an author jokes about certain parts of his guide or him/herself that has a connection with the champion can confuse the readers.

Saying that you're a Zoe Main as a joke is something I dislike when specifically an author does it at the wrong time, with the wrong way.

Let's change perspective.

Let's say that I've read the guide.
" Hmm... is this guide trustworthy and has correct information and guidance to master this champion? Is the author a pro at this champion? "

* Heads to the comment section *

Ooh! " Zoe Main btw ".
So the author is a pro and a main at this champion, this guy probably knows what he's doing! Let's follow this guide.

Now, I'm not saying that the guide is correct. I'm not saying that the guide is incorrect. What I'm trying to say is that there are many things we haven't discovered about Zoe yet. As I mentioned in my first comment. Her strategies and mechanics, wise decision makings in different aspects, matchups and perspectives and state and positions of the game, they cannot be mastered and discovered and fully explored in two weeks or less. Everything takes time, there are things we haven't discovered yet.

This is why I believe, for the greater good, that you remove the comment you did. " Zoe Main btw " to avoid confusing the readers. I assure you that I know from your perspective that you wrote it as a joke. But if you want a good and great guide, let's remove your comment for the greater good to not confuse players.
As I said;

Think before you speak.