Yeah but unless the laner you're ganking has no escape possibility you won't get that much benefit from W, but if you have Q maxed you have R+Q combo and he can't get away from that if you lock on him.
Life is 10% of what happens to you and 90% of how you react to it.
Sigs made by: LaCorpse, jhoijhoi, Katoki, JEFFY40HANDS, The_Nameless_Bard and Sk1llbug
-||- Check out my Master Yi guide -||-
Looool, no.
ALWAYS Q.
Q is RELIABLE damage. W is not. Q scales upwards much quicker than W. Q costs more mana, but who cares, you'd never run out unless you max it anyways.
ALWAYS Q.
Q is RELIABLE damage. W is not. Q scales upwards much quicker than W. Q costs more mana, but who cares, you'd never run out unless you max it anyways.
"If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses." - Henry Ford
"I contend we are both atheists, I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F Roberts
"I contend we are both atheists, I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F Roberts
In addition to what Zoki and Searz have already said, one point in W is sufficient for jungling at all stages of the game. Against small camps, just the single point in W and Warwick's passive are enough to keep him at nearly max HP throughout his jungle.
OTGBionicArm wrote: Armored wimminz = badass.
My posts may be long. If this bothers you, don't read them.
My posts may be long. If this bothers you, don't read them.
You need to log in before commenting.
<Member>
Check out my extensive Sivir Guide