Bioalchemist wrote:
the people who have cases against them deserve the case more often than not...way more often than not from what i have seen so far.
This has been my experience as well
Brave Sparrow
Bioalchemist wrote:
the people who have cases against them deserve the case more often than not...way more often than not from what i have seen so far.
Atropa wrote:
This has been my experience as well
Correct it has been the same with my experiences as well, however I do believe that the system is also good at keeping fraudulent cases out as well, my case for this being that in most cases a pardon is a rare thing, the system has flaws but for every person who receives an unjust ban there are a 100 just bans, however 1 unjust ban is still too many.
Excited to see what they do with the Tribunal in season 4

You need to log in before commenting.
this suggests that you could have people who are fairly uneducated making decisions...what i mean by that is that most people see someone flame and immediately punish without considering both sides of the story presented in chat.
luckily multiple people review the same cases so even if one person makes a poor decision others can still keep the person from getting an unfair judgement.
system seems to work well enough. the people who have cases against them deserve the case more often than not...way more often than not from what i have seen so far.