DillButt64 wrote:
the part that you didnt understand is that if there is a game inbetween TP and MM in the timeline and the MM link isnt there teaching the link in that game it would be a bit weird because there is no reason why he shouldnt be helping that link, yes you could say that hes only called to help TP link because hes howling in wolf form to call him and no other link can do that but im pretty sure the wolf howling is the "instrument" in that zelda game, so i see no reason why if any other link incarnation plays the same song the ghost of MM link wouldnt help them if they were in a specific place
As I said, a plethora of reasons. You just brought one up yourself.
Anyways, you're bringing up a hypothetical situation that cannot in any way disprove of the theory at hand simply because it's hypothetical.
"Doing something, almost being done, then parents come in and don't let you finish.
Yes, I had a rough childhood." - devdevil
Yes, I had a rough childhood." - devdevil
im not trying to disprove it and i know its hypothetical (other than the fact that hes not in four swords helping that link thats actually a fact not a hypothetical, it was however a different kind of zelda game though) im just saying that is the only part of the theory i dont like and im sure the theory would still be good without that whole point
Thanks to TheNamelessBard for the signature
*Like in Alice, it's all a dream.
*The 5 stages of death are aren't connected to Link himself but the inhabitants.
->They know the moons going to crash and kill them, so they live through these stages.
*Link isn't the center of this story, he isn't even a "real" part of it, he's simply a watcher to this tale but decides to take action.
The developers didn't intend to kill Link and put him into purgatory, but to create a game with a deeper, graver storyline, teaching the player the meaning of "death" by letting them be bystanders.
*The 5 stages of death are aren't connected to Link himself but the inhabitants.
->They know the moons going to crash and kill them, so they live through these stages.
*Link isn't the center of this story, he isn't even a "real" part of it, he's simply a watcher to this tale but decides to take action.
The developers didn't intend to kill Link and put him into purgatory, but to create a game with a deeper, graver storyline, teaching the player the meaning of "death" by letting them be bystanders.
^Yeah, I agree with Dill here. Interesting idea, but ultimately contradictory.
"If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses." - Henry Ford
"I contend we are both atheists, I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F Roberts
"I contend we are both atheists, I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F Roberts
You need to log in before commenting.
but like i said thats the only part in the theory i dont really like because why only teach the TP link and not the four sword link(s) or IF they made a game inbetween MM and TP in the timeline if hes not in that game it only makes it a bit weirder why he would just skip a whole generation, the rest of the theory i actually like and agree with
also Searz do you mind giving me the "plethora of reasons" instead of just saying there are reasons?