I didn't rate your build, as there's nothing wrong with the actual build, even if its author is rather rude and the build is slightly unoriginal.

I postet a screen of today first win.
Hm.. CDR@18 ? hmm but we need CDR at beggining not by lev(if that's what you mean). Early game made you or kill you.
Masteries. Hmm i Didn't now what to go on really xd Like I said "you should now how to play garen, masteires are usless"
Heroic. Ok stop this. You gave me bad score because you are offended in my respond. Thats all now go cry outside i dont want your comments here. No ofence.

I usually downrate builds that are written that way (not talking about the english, just that when someone starts a build with "This is my PRO BUILD", it's just anoying and pretentious).

As the build is really good itself, i won't, but please, make some effort to write better ... don't put a single block of text on a desc, use your "Enter" key, make some points, try to format.

And most of all : remember you're just a squishy human, not better nor more intelligent than others. Humility is a quality, insults and violence are not.

Talking about the build itself :
Masteries :
- Offense : what about only 2 points in alacrity (2% AS instead of 3) and get the 15% Magic Pen ? Judgment and Demacian Justice are AP damages, this could help a lot more than 1% AS.
- Defense : why do you go for +10% MS on evade with a 0% evade build ? (2% from masteries are just useless alone)

Runes : CDR is a choice you made for this build, so i'll keep it. But don't you think getting some CDR@18 could be better ? Here i provide you some maths :
- Full flat CDR (your build) :14.82% CDR at all levels.
- Flat glyphs and CDR@18 quinte : 10.29% at level 1. 14.97% at level 13. 16.92% at level 18.
- Flat quinte and CDR@18 glyphs : 9.42% at level 1. 14.82% at level 13. 17.07% at level 18.
- CDR@18 glyphs and quinte : 4.89% at level 1. 14.97% at level 13. 19.17% at level 18.

I do not claim any of these is better, it's just so you can have some numbers to rely on. Just make your choice.

I did comment your build. That's the point. Since you made an insult towards my reading abilities I made a response to your writing abilities. No need to be so dramatic. Someone is resentful for not being able to communicate a clear message.

"and with that two (STOP) + thormail" some one is resentful for not understanding.. i have an idea. Sorry for my bad english but you should STFU and comment a build not my english.
Thx. Now get lost.

Uh, alright then in that case learn to format and punctuate properly. Your entire description is basically a string of run-on sentences without the use of proper English, so when you say "Armor + hp and great ref! its perfect, they will always focus on you, ALWAYS trust me.. and with that two + thornmail you could get them real pain" I link them together. This is because you're using pronouns instead of nouns while jumping back and forth between subjects.

Isn't English fun? Maybe next time you'll reconsider your sarcastic remarks in response to some feedback over a very poorly worded description.

Thanks.

P.S. You're welcome for the English lesson.

Learn to read pls. God.. 2x sunfire not thornmails. Thx.

What's the point in getting more than one Thornmail? Its passive is unique, meaning it doesn't stack. It stays at +200 Armor (for two of them) and 30% damage returned, instead of +200 Armor and 60% damage returned.