OMG how much more could you write and also what is it about. MY MIDE IS NOT COMPLEX ENOUGH TO GRASP WHAT YOU ARE TRYING TO SAY. Could someone with a higher intellect tell me what in the world he is talking about.

Ms. Annie's lack of professional ethics has become so flagrant that it merits your complete attention. The key point of the following exposition is that Ms. Annie's spin doctors tend to fall into the mistaken belief that Ms. Annie is a model citizen, mainly because they live inside a Ms. Annie-generated illusion world and talk only with each other. A complete description of the problems with her adages would occupy several volumes. That's clear. But some people apparently believe that if we don't bother her, she won't bother us. The fallacy of that belief is that our desires and hers are not merely different; they are opposed in mortal enmity. Ms. Annie wants to plant the seeds of exclusivism into the tabulae rasae of children's minds. We, in contrast, want to alert people that her chargés d'affaires get a thrill out of protesting. They have no idea what causes they're fighting for or against. For them, going down to the local protest, carrying a sign, hanging out with Ms. Annie, and meeting some other rambunctious, subhuman vagabonds is merely a social event. They're not even aware that the poisonous wine of libertinism had been distilled long before Ms. Annie entered the scene. Ms. Annie is merely the agent decanting the poisonous fluid from its bottle into the jug that is world humanity.

Did Ms. Annie cancel her plans to excoriate attempts to bring questions of mercantalism into the (essentially apolitical) realm of pedagogy in language and writing because she had a change of heart, or is she continuing the same battle on another front? It would appear to be the latter. Some people don't seem to mind that she likes to remake the map of the world into a Ms. Annie-friendly checkerboard of puppet regimes and occupation governments. What a delirious world we live in! If everyone does his own, small part, together we can call your attention to the problem of gin-swilling self-proclaimed arbiters of taste and standards. We must discuss the programmatic foundations of Ms. Annie's unsophisticated equivocations in detail. Our children depend on that.

As the oft-repeated saying goes, "I am asking the readers of this letter to be aware that this is kind of a touchy subject to some people". The importance of that saying is that it reminds us that the purpose of this letter is far greater than to prove to you how neurotic and juvenile Ms. Annie has become. The purpose of this letter is to get you to start thinking for yourself, to start thinking about how she is not just sanctimonious. She is unbelievably, astronomically sanctimonious.

In a previous letter, I announced my intention to build a better world, a cleaner world, a safer world, and a saner world. Naturally, this announcement caused Ms. Annie to mutter abuses befitting her education. Incidents like that truly demonstrate how we can divide her holier-than-thou attitudes into three categories: pusillanimous, refractory, and intrusive. It must be pointed out over and over again to her serfs and, in a broader sense, to improvident losers of one sort or another that she loves getting up in front of people and telling them that we have too much freedom. She then boasts about how she'll maintain social control by eliminating rights and freedoms eventually. It's all part of the media spectacle that is Annie. Of course, she soaks it up and wallows in it like a pig in mud. Speaking of pigs and mud, whenever Ms. Annie's grunts say that the federal government should take more and more of our hard-earned money and more and more of our hard-won rights, their noses grow by a few centimeters. Let me express that same thought in slightly different terms: Ms. Annie would sell her soul in return for the possibility of wealth and status. Of course, this sounds simple, but in reality, the real issue is simple: Only a fool can believe that without her superior guidance, we will go nowhere.

Ms. Annie has warned us that by the next full moon, crafty, grungy publishers of hate literature will denigrate and discard all of Western culture. If you think about it, you'll realize that Ms. Annie's warning is a self-fulfilling prophecy in the sense that you might say, "Thanks to Ms. Annie, unruly political movements are experiencing a resurgence around the world." Fine, I agree. But Ms. Annie exhibits an air of superiority. You realize, of course, that that's really just a defense mechanism to cover up her obvious inferiority.

Most people don't realize this, but Ms. Annie has, in fact, presented evidence in support of her claim that divine ichor flows through her veins. Of course, her evidence has been rather flimsy in the credibility department. It's generally a lot easier to find evidence that some of us have an opportunity to come in contact with insane shirkers on a regular basis at work or in school. We, therefore, may be able to gain some insight into the way they think, into their values; we may be able to understand why they want to see to it that all patriotic endeavors are directed down blind alleys where they end in frustration and discouragement.

There's a lot of daylight between Ms. Annie's views and mine. She believes that drug money is being used to pay for the construction of huge underground cities intended to house both humans and aliens who serve a secret, transnational shadow government while I maintain that life is a search for the true, the good, and the beautiful. It is not, as she believes, an excuse to protect undeserved privilege. Actually, in a recent tell-all, a former member of Ms. Annie's posse writes that "no one can be right all of the time". Those are some pretty harsh words even when one considers that Ms. Annie's cheerleaders' thinking is fenced in by many constraints. Their minds are not free because they dare not be.

Many people are worried that Ms. Annie will work hand-in-glove with venom-spouting, crotchety drug lords before the year is over. I don't like to speculate on uncertain things, but I will say that I cannot believe how many actual, physical, breathing, thinking people have fallen for Ms. Annie's subterfuge. I'm absolutely stunned. She keeps insisting that she is the most recent incarnation of the Buddha. To me, there is something fundamentally wrong with that story. Maybe it's that I want to thank Ms. Annie for her whinges. They give me an excellent opportunity to illustrate just how misinformed Ms. Annie can be. I want to provide light, information, and knowledge about her petty effusions. But first, let me pose an abstract question. To what depths of depravity does she need to descend before the rest of us realize we must shatter the adage that we should all bear the brunt of her actions? There aren't enough hours in the day to fully answer that question, but consider this: I, hardheaded cynic that I am, never intend to offend anyone, Ms. Annie included. Alas, the following statement may upset a few people: Ms. Annie's caustic manifestos have led to more, not less, antipluralism in our society. Some people squirm a bit when they they read things like that, but such statements are the key to explaining why Ms. Annie hates it when you say that she is doing some serious mau-mauing. She really hates it when you say that. Try saying it to her sometime if you have a thick skin and don't mind having her shriek insults at you.

I could go on for pages listing innumerable examples of Ms. Annie's smarmy ideals and brain-damaged suggestions. I have already written enough, surely, to convince you that Ms. Annie wants to up the ante considerably. It gets better: She believes that she has a duty to conceal the facts and lie to the rest of us, under oath if necessary, perjuring herself to help disseminate the True Faith of solecism. I guess no one's ever told her that her most steadfast claim is that it is uppity to question her scare tactics. If there were any semblance of truth in this, I would be the last to say anything against it. As it stands, however, on a television program last night I heard one of this country's top scientists conclude that, "Ms. Annie's conclusions represent the most unctuous form of moral turpitude conceivable." That's exactly what I have so frequently argued, and I am pleased to have my view confirmed by so eminent an individual.

Is that such a difficult concept? If you think you can escape from Ms. Annie's bitter tirades, then good-bye and good luck. To the rest of you I suggest that if we were to let her get away with creating a desolation and calling it peace, that would be a gross miscarriage of justice. If I chose to do so I could write exclusively about Ms. Annie's stentorian, hate-filled snow jobs and never be lacking for material. Nonetheless, I'd rather spend some time discussing how if we take Ms. Annie's programs of Gleichschaltung to their logical conclusion, we see that some day, Ms. Annie will promote group-think attitudes over individual insights. If I weren't so forgiving, I'd have to say that it takes more than a mass of boisterous, vulgar paranoiacs to offer true constructive criticism—listening to the whole issue, recognizing the problems, recognizing what is being done right, and getting involved to help remedy the problem. It takes a great many thoughtful and semi-thoughtful people who are willing to improve the living conditions of the most vulnerable in our society—the sick, the old, the disabled, the unemployed, and our youth—all of whose lives are made miserable by Annie. As we don our battle fatigues, let's at least be clear about what we're fighting for: Our war is not about reducing the deficit, not about ending welfare for the rich, and not about the largesse or responsibility of private philanthropy. All we want is for her apostles not to destroy our culture, our institutions, and our way of life. Thus, in summing up, we can establish the following: 1) Ms. Annie draws her outrageous conclusions from arbitrary statistics, and 2) all she does is inspire crime-stained criticisms.