Jebus McAzn wrote:
Get directly on Dexto's account and change his vote from down to up - that's basically the only way to "fix" it.
Still, 96% is really, really good...
I guess I'll have to be really sneaky next time I see him in class, which is Tuesday. I hope he doesn't lurk in the forums in his spare time so he doesn't see my devious plans... >:-D
This clearly shows what are creators about.
Locking the guide makes you simply go for rating. I dont think that this score is representing anything atm. It could be 100% or 50% just becouse you locked it you will not get the dv and so on this ends up like the "old" score system.
Your build is great ofc it deserves to be highrated, but this is made not for the creator, it is made for ppl that read guides.
Have fun with it, while it lasts.
Locking the guide makes you simply go for rating. I dont think that this score is representing anything atm. It could be 100% or 50% just becouse you locked it you will not get the dv and so on this ends up like the "old" score system.
Your build is great ofc it deserves to be highrated, but this is made not for the creator, it is made for ppl that read guides.
Have fun with it, while it lasts.
DEWO wrote:
This clearly shows what are creators about.
Locking the guide makes you simply go for rating. I dont think that this score is representing anything atm. It could be 100% or 50% just becouse you locked it you will not get the dv and so on this ends up like the "old" score system.
Your build is great ofc it deserves to be highrated, but this is made not for the creator, it is made for ppl that read guides.
Have fun with it, while it lasts.
I agree, but I don't quite see how the new voting system is making the guides less useful for the reader. The scores are still comparative, they're just ~15% higher. This encourages more of an open constructive criticism environment (at least in my personal experience), where I would usually just down vote and not provide criticism for a lack of time/patience, now I feel obligated to do so.
One criticism I do have of this system is it creates a loop where someone can say "Your build looks good, but there's an obvious flaw (stated here) -1", and the build creator can come back, and with any amount of cunning can talk their way into making the commenter look like an idiot. They could say, "well, I mainly prioritize DPS in this build, so your argument is invalid." This basically makes it so the guide creator can make his guide look bullet-proof by using cliche'd and generally invalid arguments that look valid on paper.
Trojan995 wrote:
I agree, but I don't quite see how the new voting system is making the guides less useful for the reader. The scores are still comparative, they're just ~15% higher. This encourages more of an open constructive criticism environment (at least in my personal experience), where I would usually just down vote and not provide criticism for a lack of time/patience, now I feel obligated to do so.
One criticism I do have of this system is it creates a loop where someone can say "Your build looks good, but there's an obvious flaw (stated here) -1", and the build creator can come back, and with any amount of cunning can talk their way into making the commenter look like an idiot. They could say, "well, I mainly prioritize DPS in this build, so your argument is invalid." This basically makes it so the guide creator can make his guide look bullet-proof by using cliche'd and generally invalid arguments that look valid on paper.
This encourages more of an open constructive criticism environment
This is srsly the opposite since you are forcing ppl to post. So far i didnt see a single "critisizm" goin on on any blocked build. This system is as i said an opposite. If you post your critisizm you are just asking for getting "punched back" if you vote down coz ppl can see you did a -1. This leads to only +1 +1 +1 situation and back to old system where older guides were totaly uncompetitive after getting some votes.
now I feel obligated to do so
as you see... and tbh if som1 forces me to do something... i will not do it, simple as that.
You need to log in before commenting.
Still, 96% is really, really good...