DillButt64 wrote:
thats why i said women not girls
But you were replying to my comment where I said girls not women
When I said girls you replied with women instead and then you call me out when I reply saying she's a 15 year old? How does that make sense? You can say "but I said women not girls" all you want and I'll just say "but I said girls not women". If I'm talking about 15 year old girls flashing their tits it makes absolutely no fcking sense to reply saying that I'm wrong because women flashing their tits is a good thing. You're talking about something completely different. The fact that "you said women not girls" only proves that you didn't know what you were talking about when you replied.
If it's only my logic then there's something wrong with you
Phil Collins wrote:
Canoas logic 2012
If it's only my logic then there's something wrong with you
15 years old = woman
If they bleed, they're women.
Otherwise, you're splitting hairs.
17 years 364 days old? girl
17 years 365 days old? woman
If they have hair on their no-no parts and dey bleed form da bagina, dey's a wumun
If they bleed, they're women.
Otherwise, you're splitting hairs.
17 years 364 days old? girl
17 years 365 days old? woman
If they have hair on their no-no parts and dey bleed form da bagina, dey's a wumun
Canoas wrote:
Some girls start bleeding when they're 9..
Because THAT's the kind of stuff canoas looks into.
Ty MM and Blood for the sigs :3 | Rammus is comming back - heard it here first!

"Carrying"-guide | My reviewservice

"Carrying"-guide | My reviewservice
You need to log in before commenting.
<Editor>