Considering you appeared baffled by the fact that you can send information and power through the same cable, I gave you a link to the relevant material. Thought you'd appreciate the info.
Satella wrote:
Considering you appeared baffled by the fact that you can send information and power through the same cable, I gave you a link to the relevant material. Thought you'd appreciate the info.
Go back and read what was written. You missed something.
"Blizzard spoke thus; Thou shalt not BM. And the players replied Nay, I shall Play my hand with Lethal already on the board. And so Blizzard sent unto them this Brawl of Yogg, As a lesson for their sins of Pride and Greed, for he is the Prophet of Madness and RNG. On that day, the tavern descended into an era of chaos and darkness, until the weekend passed and everyone forgot all about it. Amen. Book of SMOrc, Verse 20, Chapter 4." - Feam T
Searz wrote:
You capitalized it, so I assumed that it was a name for a product or something like that. You don't use capitalization on power line. You do on Wi-Fi on the other hand, because it's a name of a standard.
talk about being picky...
Searz wrote:
As for your question: I'm not sure.. You can normally measure the delay in hertz, and normal power lines have 50-60hertz, while 5GHz Wi-Fi has 5,000,000,000hertz, so on updating frequency the wireless is far beyond that of the power line, but I'm not entirely sure that is all there is to the question..
you measure delay in second, not hertz. with hertz you can measure the frequency of the delay, depending on the concept. its different.
you are mixing the power phase frequency with the information frequency. by definition, information doesn't need energy to be transmited. you can use whatever frequency you want, as long as the amplitude of the signal doesn't disturb the power distribution and the equipment is fast enough to capture the signal.
Pheyniex wrote:
talk about being picky...
YOP
I can't help that others here have problems expressing themselves :)
Quoted:
you measure delay in second, not hertz. with hertz you can measure the frequency of the delay, depending on the concept. its different.
you are mixing the power phase frequency with the information frequency. by definition, information doesn't need energy to be transmited. you can use whatever frequency you want, as long as the amplitude of the signal doesn't disturb the power distribution and the equipment is fast enough to capture the signal.
you are mixing the power phase frequency with the information frequency. by definition, information doesn't need energy to be transmited. you can use whatever frequency you want, as long as the amplitude of the signal doesn't disturb the power distribution and the equipment is fast enough to capture the signal.
Which is almost exactly what I said. Thanks for confirming my doubts.
So, do you know what kind of response time one can expect with a power line adapter compared to a 5GHz wireless network?
"I sexually Identify as an Attack Helicopter. Ever since I was a boy I dreamed of soaring over the oilfields dropping hot sticky loads on disgusting foreigners. People say to me that a person being a helicopter is Impossible and I’m ****ing ******ed but I don’t care, I’m beautiful. I’m having a plastic surgeon install rotary blades, 30 mm cannons and AMG-114 Hellfire missiles on my body. From now on I want you guys to call me “Apache†and respect my right to kill from above and kill needlessly. If you can’t accept me you’re a heliphobe and need to check your vehicle privilege. Thank you for being so understanding." - Guuse
"uh, I identify as counterstrike and I find this globally offensive" - ???
"uh, I identify as counterstrike and I find this globally offensive" - ???
I don't think the technology is developed that far, as well it has been designed mainly for urban management.
I also like lots of cables.
YOP
I can't help that others here have problems expressing themselves :)
if you are depending on a capital letter to understand a concept, i don't know why you'd mention other's way of expressing themselves.
I also like lots of cables.
Searz wrote:
YOP
I can't help that others here have problems expressing themselves :)
if you are depending on a capital letter to understand a concept, i don't know why you'd mention other's way of expressing themselves.
Pheyniex wrote:
if you are depending on a capital letter to understand a concept, i don't know why you'd mention other's way of expressing themselves.
Oh gee, not again Phey >.>
Y u always goin' an' takin' me too seriously?
"Gold can't buy you rape." - Mr Sark
Links to an article on the Steam Machine hardware beta Valve is doing:
http://www.theverge.com/2013/11/4/5063760/we-try-the-steam-machine-valves-video-game-console-of-the-future
Their case looks pretty good.
http://www.theverge.com/2013/11/4/5063760/we-try-the-steam-machine-valves-video-game-console-of-the-future
Their case looks pretty good.
"We've had a few gloomy years with bad console ports, and what do we get in the light at the end of the console-tunnel? A tablet OS ported to PC." - Atlas Tasume, on Windows 8
You need to log in before commenting.
Of course, wireless is more susceptible to interference, but I'm assuming good to ideal conditions here, and at those conditions I'm pretty sure any difference that isn't battery-related is purely placebo.
The vast majority of people do not live in a place with "ideal conditions". Unless you live in a suburban single house you ARE going to get 2.4GHz band contamination. Fortunately this mostly affects Wi-Fi and not your typical wireless peripheral but wireless technology is by no means perfect or even technologically mature.
Also, Power over Ethernet is a thing.