Forum Awards 2014! - Conclusion

[quote=DillButt64]im kinda upset i didnt get the best butt award[/quote]

[quote=Mooninites][quote=DillButt64]im kinda upset i didnt get the best butt award[/quote] my butt belongs to you, so its essentially like you're getting an award. no homo[/quote]

[quote=DillButt64]im going to destroy that award winning butt tonight no homo[/quote]

[quote=Meiyjhe]Boys and girls, If you got the time and energy I would really appreciate it if you fill in [url=https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/QRHMB3K]this survey[/url]. That way I can organise a better forum awards for this year :P[/quote]

[quote=Jovy]Done.[/quote]

[quote=Meiyjhe]Results from the survey: * People are divided on the nomination planning. Some of them think it should be done early like it was done last year. Others think it should be later like it was in 2013. Thus I shall take the middle road and start it up somewhere in the summer holiday. * People think the troublemaker category should be removed and that the categories should be explained better. * The coding of the opening posts should improve as it is "too texty" and "unclean" * People are unsure for writing down their own names in the nomination. Either this will be explained better or this criteria will be removed. * People think the nominations should be filtered by me. Making sure that only "legit" nominees can participate. Whether this should be done or not, I am unsure. Especially as I would have to judge what counts as a "good" or a "bad" nominee. Did you not fill in the survey, but do you have comments on the list above? Or did you fill in the survey and want to explain your reasoning behind one of the points above? Please post a comment so that next time it can be better once more.[/quote]

[quote=emoriam]After thinking about it for a while removing the troublemaker category is fine. We don't want to instigate people do behave like dicks and support them, don't we? Anything concerning the existing categories except for the troublemaker one and the explanations? I mean, are people satisfied with the amount of categories? [size=1]I actually suggested adding a few more categories in the survey.[/size][/quote]

[quote=sirell]Well, being a troublemaker doesn't mean you're a dick. You can cause trouble in a non-destructive way, like humourous trolling. And y'know, people are gonna 'be dicks' anyway and it's never really for the sake of a forum award.[/quote]

[quote=emoriam][quote=sirell]Well, being a troublemaker doesn't mean you're a dick. You can cause trouble in a non-destructive way, like humourous trolling.[/quote] well, when thinking of the nominess last time around I guess it was more about the seriousness[/quote]

[quote=Meiyjhe][quote=emoriam]Just simply remove the self-nomination. People could still vote for themselves if they put their names into the form (such dipshits).[/quote]The reason I want people to write down their names when nominating people is because then I can just copypaste the whole scheme into excel instead of writing down myself what the name is of the person :P (Writing it all down can be quite annoying if you have a lot of nominees) [quote=emoriam]After thinking about it for a while removing the troublemaker category is fine. We don't want to instigate people do behave like dicks and support them, don't we?[/quote][quote=sirell]Well, being a troublemaker doesn't mean you're a dick. You can cause trouble in a non-destructive way, like humourous trolling. [/quote]What sirell said was indeed the original intend. Seemingly not everyone was enthousiastic for this category, this it shall be blended with the witty category to create a humorous category. [quote=emoriam]Anything concerning the existing categories except for the troublemaker one and the explanations? I mean, are people satisfied with the amount of categories? [size=1]I actually suggested adding a few more categories in the survey.[/size][/quote]What kind of categories were you thinking of?[/quote]