[EUW] Inhouses request

[quote=Vapora Dark][quote=Luther3000]How about instead of that we stop trollpicking when we don't get our roles and bming people who are dced/lagging then spamming laugh emotes, bragging and talking shit about it in all chat? Just a thought. Yesterday's games were worse than an average solo queue game in every aspect.[/quote] Well I feel like this was all directed at me, so first of all, I didn't trollpick because I "didn't get my role". I've been filling the past few weeks, in case you hadn't noticed. When I saw I had to support I wasn't sure who I wanted to play, and all the traditional supports seemed boring, so I wanted to do something different, like [[swain]] support, or AP [[alistar]]/[[malphite]]. I couldn't think of anything semi-decent to play, but I remembered once doing well with Caitlyn support so I picked it again. It didn't go so well this time. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Second of all, I have no idea what you're referring to with this: [quote=luther3000]bming people who are dced/lagging then spamming laugh emotes, bragging and talking shit about it in all chat[/quote] If I had to guess, then presumably Fox was lagging? I wasn't aware of this at any point, if he was. If by BM'ing you mean clicking laugh every now and again, well, I do that most games, so... Idk what you mean by bragging and talking shit about it. All I remember about it was someone said in all chat "Fox ragequit", to which I responded "LOL" because I thought it was really petty that he'd ragequit over getting bullied around in lane (because right before he'd DC'd I'd landed a Q on him and brought him down from about 100% HP to 30%). If he ragequit because he was lagging, then again, I had no idea. And as far as I can remember, that's all I said in response to his ragequit. I don't see how that's "bragging and talking shit about it". Maybe you mistook it as an insinuated "LOL, i'm such a god for making my lane opponent rage quit, gg im the best". But you'd be wrong. Maybe I'm mistaken and you were directing that to someone else, but as I didn't see anyone else do that either it doesn't make sense either way. ------------------------ Lower the maximum wait time then. As it is I end up regretting playing most inhouse games because of how long we spend waiting for people to reconnect.[/quote]

[quote=Wayne3100]Most games? I can barely remember the last time we paused for more than 5 minutes :|[/quote]

[quote=sirell]Well, we seem to have a practical solution and compromise. Would it be better to carry on playing with the DC or to remake? Because playing with a DC is not fun, but I suppose that's the initiative of the disadvantaged team to surrender the game at 20 if that's the case. Might be better than remaking a game.[/quote]

[quote=Thalia Kael]On NA inhouses during long pauses we just have fun talking, laughing and trash talking and only a few people get annoyed (nothing wrong with that) in my experience[/quote]

[quote=Luther3000]I meant someone else with the second part. The Caitlyn thing didn't bother me [i]that[/i] much, I just wish that you'd asked before doing it. [size=1]plus we also had a renekton jungle[/size][/quote]

[quote=utopus][quote=Vapora Dark]Can we please stop pausing the game every single time someone disconnects? Who cares if it gives that person's team a disadvantage, these are meant to be for fun and I sure as hell am not having fun when we waste 10-20 minutes every inhouse day on pauses alone. Every single day we have various dc's and it's really putting me off of inhouses when we have to pause for like 5 minutes before 2 minutes because someone's DC'd. I would rather lose a game because of internet issues than have to sit there doing nothing for 5-10 minutes every single game. Am I alone here or what?[/quote] On the flip side, ending a game as a 4v5 could very well be consideres wasting even more time than the time you current spent paused.[/quote]