Which of these champs is considered more viable?

[quote=Anandre]Wow, such a necro and so out-of-date. WW's so weak right now, and Pantheon's getting a lot of playtime.[/quote]

[quote=Samoh]Old thread which this naparu guy is bringing back to promote his own guide, pantheon.[/quote]

[quote=Snowfall]-awaits Dufftime's reply of [[Olaf]]- Depends on the context - For a newbie, [[Warwick]] is a very viable jungler if you're not very experienced. [[Olaf]] would be the second best jungler, and [[Pantheon]] would be the worst. As for solo top, [[Pantheon]] would be the worst in most match-ups, however in the handso f a pro, he is a force to be reckoned with. I'm not sure how [[Olaf]] and [[Warwick]] compare to each other - [[Warwick]] has insane sustain, whereas [[Olaf]] has strong damage, decent sustain and requires a lot of farm. As for fun, it'd probably be [[Pantheon]] at the top, [[Olaf]] next and then [[Warwick]]. However, they're all rather viable - It's just that [[Pantheon]] is probably the weaker of the three, and [[Warwick]] + [[Olaf]] each have their strengths and weaknesses. EDIT :- Oh, a [url=http://ninjawiththeorangetshirt.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/dumbbitch.jpg]necro poster[/url], trying to promote his own guide -_-[/quote]

[quote=TheJohn]Both Warwick and Olaf are viable right now. Olaf is a great solo champion and WW can jungle really well Pantheon is a really bad choice[/quote]

[quote=DuffTime]OLAF NECROMACIA[/quote]

[quote=Nighthawk]I feel that Olaf was a really cool guy and deserves a medal for what he did in Skyrim. Wait what?[/quote]

[quote=Snowfall][quote=DuffTime] OLAF NECROMACIA [/quote] Called it.[/quote]

[quote=Asian]Just not pantheon. Olaf is somewhat situational. So warwick :)[/quote]

[quote=Joobieo#41288]I think the real answer is they are all viable in the right hands.[/quote]

[quote=DuffTime][quote=Snowfall] Called it. [/quote] ahue[/quote]