Official QQ Thread

[quote=lokinman]I have to QQ about global ults lagging the game... esp in team fights. Very sad...QQ[/quote]

[quote=Crows foot]It's not lag, pantheon ult is supposed to slow you![/quote]

[quote=RuleofThree]I hate it when I talk about the one sidedness of games in both ranked and normal, and people only respond with 'Get a better elo, newb.' This response does not offer any useful information at all, people. What is 'a better elo?' I have 1231, or there abouts. I am under the impression that this is pretty good..I don't know if it's wonderful, or great..but I think it's the sign of a good player. Is there some sort of ranking catagory? 0-500 Beginner, 501-1000 Intermediate, etc? This would help me understand what a 'better elo' is... Furthermore, if there isn't a standardized ranking catagory as stated above, then isn't a 'good elo' all subjective? Mr. Gaming for fun might seen an elo of 1000 as pretty good, while Mr. Pro thinks you are an utter newb unless you have a 1500 elo. In short...when I get tired of playing in absolutely craptastic games, and ask where all the 'good players' are...don't flipping answer with 'at a higher elo' then think you are clever and funny, by ending it with 'newb.' Do the right thing, offer details.[/quote]

[quote=IceCreamy]I'd say 1800+ is for the pros, 1300-1800 is for the intermediate players and <1300 is for people who still need to learn :P I am 1308 I believe, but I don't often play ranked. I like to think I should be around 1500 but hey, I am not so what am I talking xD[/quote]

[quote=koksei][quote=IceCreamy] I'd say 1800+ is for the pros, 1300-1800 is for the intermediate players and <1300 is for people who still need to learn :P I am 1308 I believe, but I don't often play ranked. I like to think I should be around 1500 but hey, I am not so what am I talking xD [/quote] Mhm.. well you could just rate it after the rankings as well: bronze (?-1399) --> new player's that probably started too soon or just aren't that good. silver (1400-1520) --> player's that are stuck in there could already be quite good or they are still raising gold (1520-1899) --> well player's in there (at least in my experience) think they are some kind of big deal and are just annoying mostly from (1500-1700) platin (1900+) --> well these are the high elo players that certainly deserve this elo (even tho 1800+ is "high-elo" in my opinion Well.. actually I am not really convinced by my own statement. Since I know people on 1200 that play better than people on 1600. And I know people on 1700 that play as well as people on 1900. But well.. I mean those ratings aren't just there for fun.[/quote]

[quote=Embracing]agreed with koksei 1200~1700 elos don't prove a lot 1900~2200 good players 2200+ pros anyways elo system's kinda messed up[/quote]

[quote=koksei][quote=RosePhoenix] agreed with koksei 1200~1700 elos don't prove a lot 1900~2200 good players 2200+ pros anyways elo system's kinda messed up [/quote] Well but slowly people actually don't say "MID OR TROLL" or flame each other anymore.. I really like that the higher you get the less flaming you face. At least it's like that since like 1600 .. had just around 6 matches up there but still. I think the athmosphere is a keypoint of winning if errybody just flames and trashtalks you can't win and it gets way better.. at least slowly :)[/quote]

[quote=omagma][quote=koksei] [quote=IceCreamy] I'd say 1800+ is for the pros, 1300-1800 is for the intermediate players and <1300 is for people who still need to learn :P I am 1308 I believe, but I don't often play ranked. I like to think I should be around 1500 but hey, I am not so what am I talking xD [/quote] Mhm.. well you could just rate it after the rankings as well: bronze (?-1399) --> new player's that probably started too soon or just aren't that good. [/quote] You call me a "new player's that probably started too soon or just aren't that good" I find that quite offensive.[/quote]

[quote=koksei][quote=omagma] [quote=koksei] [quote=IceCreamy] I'd say 1800+ is for the pros, 1300-1800 is for the intermediate players and <1300 is for people who still need to learn :P I am 1308 I believe, but I don't often play ranked. I like to think I should be around 1500 but hey, I am not so what am I talking xD [/quote] Mhm.. well you could just rate it after the rankings as well: bronze (?-1399) --> new player's that probably started too soon or just aren't that good. [/quote] You call me a "new player's that probably started too soon or just aren't that good" I find that quite offensive. [/quote] No intention behind it lol. It's more like if you have played enough matches like 100 ranked's and you are still bronze you are either just not that good or you started too soon, which many people do.[/quote]

[quote=omagma]I played ranked the moment i hit 30, i ended at 800 ELO. I have now carried my way from the depth off noob hell, to 1328 Elo.[/quote]