Shut up Arcana :D Nameless, it looks amazing. I'll use both :D

ì‚¬ëž‘ì€ ìž¥ë‹˜ì´ë‹¤. | ความงามในความà¹à¸‚็งà¹à¸£à¸‡. | æ„›ã¯æ²»ç™‚ã§ã™.
The_Nameless_Bard wrote:

better?
I see pixels on your background, bit low quality.. And I dont like the blur/lighting over the edges of Brad Pitt. Doesn't make him the main part of your sig, which it should be imo. You want to create depth in your si with blurring the background but then you set a lighting which demolish your whole depth.
It's shocking how hard it is to find a good quality image of Brad Pitt....I really don't like the image I ended up with...:(
and here's one without the lighting, if you like it better.
and here's one without the lighting, if you like it better.

Honestly, I do not care about the "pixels" in the background. I liked the signature the way it was :D

ì‚¬ëž‘ì€ ìž¥ë‹˜ì´ë‹¤. | ความงามในความà¹à¸‚็งà¹à¸£à¸‡. | æ„›ã¯æ²»ç™‚ã§ã™.

ì‚¬ëž‘ì€ ìž¥ë‹˜ì´ë‹¤. | ความงามในความà¹à¸‚็งà¹à¸£à¸‡. | æ„›ã¯æ²»ç™‚ã§ã™.
You need to log in before commenting.
better?