This thread is locked
PLEASE NOTE: This thread has been locked by the moderators. You cannot reply to it.
Anastasios wrote:
Still from what i know Canoas, this isn't a 16+ website.
And Potatis, don't play stupid. It doesn't work.
Only one being stupid here is u?
honestly, I'm actually laughing at your incompetence hahaha
I told you to read the rules, and you went and read the US laws? This is so funny.. mobafire is in Canada. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
However, it doesn't matter what you want to define as mature or obscene, the adult content concept is very explicit (pun intended =P). It is only adult material if it's considered 18+, and french kissing is simply not considered 18+. Not in the US, not in Canada, not in any civilized country. Still, if you're really thick then just check other websites where adult content is strictly forbidden, like YouTube, and see how there's over 18000 results for french kissing.
HAHAHAHAHA, and again! Your incompetence doesn't cease to amaze me!
The two creatures in the video are not white, therefore by your definition they're not unicorns!
Seriously, you could have at least gotten a definition that didn't destroy your own argument..
I told you to read the rules, and you went and read the US laws? This is so funny.. mobafire is in Canada. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Quoted:
This Free User Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Province of British Columbia and the laws of Canada applicable therein, without giving effect to any choice-of-law or conflict-of-law provision or rule that would cause the application of the laws of any jurisdiction other than British Columbia.
However, it doesn't matter what you want to define as mature or obscene, the adult content concept is very explicit (pun intended =P). It is only adult material if it's considered 18+, and french kissing is simply not considered 18+. Not in the US, not in Canada, not in any civilized country. Still, if you're really thick then just check other websites where adult content is strictly forbidden, like YouTube, and see how there's over 18000 results for french kissing.
HAHAHAHAHA, and again! Your incompetence doesn't cease to amaze me!
Quoted:
P.S. Unicorn = The unicorn is a legendary animal from European folklore that resembles a white horse with a large, pointed, spiraling horn projecting from its forehead, and sometimes a goat's beard and cloven hooves. This is what i meant when i said that you were "playing stupid".
The two creatures in the video are not white, therefore by your definition they're not unicorns!
Seriously, you could have at least gotten a definition that didn't destroy your own argument..
How the **** did I miss that MOBAFire is in Canada, i have read the rules a million times. This is what happens when your mother *****es all day to do your homework.
Anyways, point taken, mea culpa, the discussion is over, i'll delete the comment cause it takes too much space.
BTW, the point of the unicorn explanation was focusing on the fact that it is considered an animal. If you weren't trying so hard to insult me, you would bypass that detail. Later in the article it is mentioned:
"The earliest description is from Ctesias who described them as wild ***es, fleet of foot, having a horn a cubit and a half in length and colored white, red and black"
"a very fierce animal called the monoceros which has the head of the stag, the feet of the elephant, and the tail of the boar, while the rest of the body is like that of the horse; it makes a deep lowing noise, and has a single black horn, which projects from the middle of its forehead, two cubits in length."(this was based on a rhinoceros).
"Instead, the Tahash animal (Exodus 25, 26, 35, 36 and 39; Numbers 4; and Ezekiel 16:10) was thought to be a kosher unicorn with a coat of many colors that only existed in biblical times."
"The unicorn, tamable only by a virgin woman, was well established in medieval lore by the time Marco Polo described them as "scarcely smaller than elephants. They have the hair of a buffalo and feet like an elephant's. They have a single large black horn in the middle of the forehead... They have a head like a wild boar's… They spend their time by preference wallowing in mud and slime. They are very ugly brutes to look at. They are not at all such as we describe them when we relate that they let themselves be captured by virgins, but clean contrary to our notions." It is clear that Marco Polo was describing a rhinoceros."
"In heraldry, a unicorn is often depicted as a horse with a goat's cloven hooves and beard, a lion's tail, and a slender, spiral horn on its forehead"
Thus, a unicorn is not specifically a while horse with a horn.
Anyways, point taken, mea culpa, the discussion is over, i'll delete the comment cause it takes too much space.
BTW, the point of the unicorn explanation was focusing on the fact that it is considered an animal. If you weren't trying so hard to insult me, you would bypass that detail. Later in the article it is mentioned:
"The earliest description is from Ctesias who described them as wild ***es, fleet of foot, having a horn a cubit and a half in length and colored white, red and black"
"a very fierce animal called the monoceros which has the head of the stag, the feet of the elephant, and the tail of the boar, while the rest of the body is like that of the horse; it makes a deep lowing noise, and has a single black horn, which projects from the middle of its forehead, two cubits in length."(this was based on a rhinoceros).
"Instead, the Tahash animal (Exodus 25, 26, 35, 36 and 39; Numbers 4; and Ezekiel 16:10) was thought to be a kosher unicorn with a coat of many colors that only existed in biblical times."
"The unicorn, tamable only by a virgin woman, was well established in medieval lore by the time Marco Polo described them as "scarcely smaller than elephants. They have the hair of a buffalo and feet like an elephant's. They have a single large black horn in the middle of the forehead... They have a head like a wild boar's… They spend their time by preference wallowing in mud and slime. They are very ugly brutes to look at. They are not at all such as we describe them when we relate that they let themselves be captured by virgins, but clean contrary to our notions." It is clear that Marco Polo was describing a rhinoceros."
"In heraldry, a unicorn is often depicted as a horse with a goat's cloven hooves and beard, a lion's tail, and a slender, spiral horn on its forehead"
Thus, a unicorn is not specifically a while horse with a horn.
Canoas wrote:
The two creatures in the video are not white, therefore by your definition they're not unicorns!
Seriously, you could have at least gotten a definition that didn't destroy your own argument..
I see were you are going with this Canoas. Give me 2 days and i will have Rarity making out with herself i no time!
This thread is being locked due to containing adult material.
Our General Rules and Guidelines state:
"No adult or illegal material of any kind including, but not limited to, video, pictures, links, discussion, or access information will be allowed anywhere on the site."
I am deeming this adult material. I know that it is a hard line to draw with these sorts of things but I'm drawing it here. Not deleting it so those of you who like posting this kind of stuff have an idea of where "the line" is...
Our General Rules and Guidelines state:
"No adult or illegal material of any kind including, but not limited to, video, pictures, links, discussion, or access information will be allowed anywhere on the site."
I am deeming this adult material. I know that it is a hard line to draw with these sorts of things but I'm drawing it here. Not deleting it so those of you who like posting this kind of stuff have an idea of where "the line" is...

Thanks to GrandMasterD for my sig!
BTW, i seriously believe this is considered mature content and should not be present in such a website. Call me the party pooper, but you are going a bit too far with sexual imagery, especially of animals.
Last time i checked Unicorn is not an animal.