DillButt64 wrote:
tosh please i already know its ********
WELL! SO WHAT! YOU CAN READ! SORRY NEXT TIME I WILL PICK A ******** EPISODE TITLED "THIS IS NOT ********" OIAJFSOIASJFOIASJFOI! DAMNIT! **** YOU YOUTUBE LABELS! **** YOOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MrCuddowls wrote:
Hahahaha telling me my items are bad HHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAhA
Listen buddy don't judge someone's items if your only level 13
This build is Platinum approved, Thats all you need to know
I got: top 20%
^Which is like 50% correct, but it's unspecific enough to fit almost anybody..
But the test was soo incredibly unspecific that I simply just picked an almost random choice to some of the questions. And in others the choice I wanted wasn't an option...
Long-***-description
^Which is like 50% correct, but it's unspecific enough to fit almost anybody..
But the test was soo incredibly unspecific that I simply just picked an almost random choice to some of the questions. And in others the choice I wanted wasn't an option...
"Moral justification is a powerful disengagement mechanism. Destructive conduct is made personally and socially acceptable by portraying it in the service of moral ends." - Albert Bandura
"Ultimately, if people lose their willingness to recognize that there are times in our history when legality becomes distinct from morality, we aren't just ceding control of our rights to government, but our futures." - Edward Snowden
"Ultimately, if people lose their willingness to recognize that there are times in our history when legality becomes distinct from morality, we aren't just ceding control of our rights to government, but our futures." - Edward Snowden
I did this a few days ago. At first I was like "oh, it's pretty accurate", but since I'm a sceptic about these kinds of things I just read it again, realising it's ********.
Look up "forer effect". Basically, when people read vague generalisations that fit pretty much anyone on the planet they still believe it's specific to them.
Look up "forer effect". Basically, when people read vague generalisations that fit pretty much anyone on the planet they still believe it's specific to them.
DillButt64 wrote:
searz if you read the rest of the thread you see this test was used to promote a tv show
That doesn't mean the test would be fake. If they have money for a tv show then they can definitely get someone to do a proper personality quiz.
DillButt64 wrote:
searz if you read the rest of the thread you see this test was used to promote a tv show =[ and i knew it was vague ******** anyways
ALL test like these are ********..
"every now and again you come across a game that has so little emotional connection to who you are that you end up standing there, gazing at the screen and saying "I'm just pressing buttons and my life has no meaning,"" - Colin Campbell
You need to log in before commenting.
you never said it was to advertise a tv show so YOU DID NOT TELL ME SO
"I have a feeling everyone got the same results % wise lol"
I was suspicious of the tests ^^ So I took them multiple times and got the same results.. so I'm like "Yup, fake".