DillButt64 wrote:
tosh please i already know its ********
WELL! SO WHAT! YOU CAN READ! SORRY NEXT TIME I WILL PICK A ******** EPISODE TITLED "THIS IS NOT ********" OIAJFSOIASJFOIASJFOI! DAMNIT! **** YOU YOUTUBE LABELS! **** YOOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
jhoijhoi wrote:
Also, I think the levels of immorality in this thread are astounding. You'd really throw a child off a boat for your own luggage? Wow.
I got: top 20%
Long-***-description
^Which is like 50% correct, but it's unspecific enough to fit almost anybody..
But the test was soo incredibly unspecific that I simply just picked an almost random choice to some of the questions. And in others the choice I wanted wasn't an option...
Long-***-description^Which is like 50% correct, but it's unspecific enough to fit almost anybody..
But the test was soo incredibly unspecific that I simply just picked an almost random choice to some of the questions. And in others the choice I wanted wasn't an option...
"I sexually Identify as an Attack Helicopter. Ever since I was a boy I dreamed of soaring over the oilfields dropping hot sticky loads on disgusting foreigners. People say to me that a person being a helicopter is Impossible and I’m ****ing ******ed but I don’t care, I’m beautiful. I’m having a plastic surgeon install rotary blades, 30 mm cannons and AMG-114 Hellfire missiles on my body. From now on I want you guys to call me “Apache†and respect my right to kill from above and kill needlessly. If you can’t accept me you’re a heliphobe and need to check your vehicle privilege. Thank you for being so understanding." - Guuse
"uh, I identify as counterstrike and I find this globally offensive" - ???
"uh, I identify as counterstrike and I find this globally offensive" - ???
Canoas
<Member>
<Member>
I did this a few days ago. At first I was like "oh, it's pretty accurate", but since I'm a sceptic about these kinds of things I just read it again, realising it's ********.
Look up "forer effect". Basically, when people read vague generalisations that fit pretty much anyone on the planet they still believe it's specific to them.
Look up "forer effect". Basically, when people read vague generalisations that fit pretty much anyone on the planet they still believe it's specific to them.
Canoas
<Member>
<Member>
DillButt64 wrote:
searz if you read the rest of the thread you see this test was used to promote a tv show
That doesn't mean the test would be fake. If they have money for a tv show then they can definitely get someone to do a proper personality quiz.
DillButt64 wrote:
searz if you read the rest of the thread you see this test was used to promote a tv show =[ and i knew it was vague ******** anyways
ALL test like these are ********..
"I saw [Twilight: Eclipse] in theaters with a girl I was dating at the time. I spent more time staring at my toes and wiggling them than I did watching this abomination. When Edward proposed to Blank Face, I finally looked up with a revelation.
I blurted out loud, in a dead silent theater full of teenage girls on opening night "Wait a minute, Edward has no blood flow. How does he get an erection?" I heard several men laughing, and had several girls turn and stare at me.
I did not get laid that night." - Berengier817
I blurted out loud, in a dead silent theater full of teenage girls on opening night "Wait a minute, Edward has no blood flow. How does he get an erection?" I heard several men laughing, and had several girls turn and stare at me.
I did not get laid that night." - Berengier817
You need to log in before commenting.
you never said it was to advertise a tv show so YOU DID NOT TELL ME SO
"I have a feeling everyone got the same results % wise lol"
I was suspicious of the tests ^^ So I took them multiple times and got the same results.. so I'm like "Yup, fake".