well, i think it was jhoijhoi who said that you can still be skilled without being gold elo, so how are you going to reward those?
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ rÑ”mÑ”mвєr tσ +rÑ”p mÑ” Ãf à dÑ”sÑ”rvÑ” Ãt! ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★

★ ★ ★ тнαикѕ тσ тнє_иαмєℓєѕѕ_вαÑ∂ fÏƒÑ Ñ‚Ð½Î¹Ñ• αмαzιиg ѕιgиαтυÑÑ”! ★ ★ ★

★ ★ ★ тнαикѕ тσ тнє_иαмєℓєѕѕ_вαÑ∂ fÏƒÑ Ñ‚Ð½Î¹Ñ• αмαzιиg ѕιgиαтυÑÑ”! ★ ★ ★
Valkenhyn wrote:
it would show up in more places since it's a fixture on your profile pic which shows up in more places than just the side of a comment pannel...other than that, nothing
That's not what sirell meant when asking the question. The question is "how is having icons for people who are gold not elitist when adding elo borders to it is?"
It'd make more sense if he'd either be in favour of or unhappy about both of them.
FireLord wrote:
well, i think it was jhoijhoi who said that you can still be skilled without being gold elo, so how are you going to reward those?
Exactly how would rewarding those people work, may I ask? Who is to say whether someone who's not gold is knowledgeable or not and deserves a "reward" (whatever that might be)?
We can't reward people based on opinions, we're basing it on the fact that someone was skilled enough to reach gold or higher (please note I mean the person itself reaching the rank, not someone else playing for them).
Also, you should probably read this again:
Mowen wrote:
Luckily this is a videogame and people can accept your opinion without you having to prove you know what you're talking about, but when you can prove you know what you're talking about that's even better. As others have said if you post on the forums a lot and people consistently agree with your opinions you will increase your ethos. If you have a symbol to show that you have experience you increase your ethos. Both ways are valid and encouraged.
Wayne3100 wrote:
Exactly how would rewarding those people work, may I ask? Who is to say whether someone who's not gold is knowledgeable or not and deserves a "reward" (whatever that might be)?
We can't reward people based on opinions, we're basing it on the fact that someone was skilled enough to reach gold or higher (please note I mean the person itself reaching the rank, not someone else playing for them).
We can't reward people based on opinions, we're basing it on the fact that someone was skilled enough to reach gold or higher (please note I mean the person itself reaching the rank, not someone else playing for them).
but you dont know that the person is skilled because it reached gold either. like i said i can ask a friend, so how will you decide whos gold because he deserves it and who doesnt?
and i can still ask my friend to help me without playing on my account. he just needs to play with a carry and i play with a support
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ rÑ”mÑ”mвєr tσ +rÑ”p mÑ” Ãf à dÑ”sÑ”rvÑ” Ãt! ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★

★ ★ ★ тнαикѕ тσ тнє_иαмєℓєѕѕ_вαÑ∂ fÏƒÑ Ñ‚Ð½Î¹Ñ• αмαzιиg ѕιgиαтυÑÑ”! ★ ★ ★

★ ★ ★ тнαикѕ тσ тнє_иαмєℓєѕѕ_вαÑ∂ fÏƒÑ Ñ‚Ð½Î¹Ñ• αмαzιиg ѕιgиαтυÑÑ”! ★ ★ ★
If they've played 50 games and still have gold they deserve it. People work hard for this and it'd be nice if you'd stop devaluing it.
If people are skilled without having gold elo and want a reward...they should just go get gold elo? I don't see the problem here, if they want a reward for being skilled that badly there should be no problem proving it in ranked games. The game itself only measures skill by Elo.
If people are skilled without having gold elo and want a reward...they should just go get gold elo? I don't see the problem here, if they want a reward for being skilled that badly there should be no problem proving it in ranked games. The game itself only measures skill by Elo.
Luther3000 wrote:
If they've played 50 games and still have gold they deserve it. People work hard for this and it'd be nice if you'd stop devaluing it.
If people are skilled without having gold elo and want a reward...they should just go get gold elo? I don't see the problem here, if they want a reward for being skilled that badly there should be no problem proving it in ranked games. The game itself only measures skill by Elo.
and why are they receiving rewards in this forum for being good in ranked games? its no longer about showing peoples elos (which can be useful), its about giving them cool avatars. the ranked games have nothing to do with this forum so it makes no sense for mobafire to give them rewards as well.
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ rÑ”mÑ”mвєr tσ +rÑ”p mÑ” Ãf à dÑ”sÑ”rvÑ” Ãt! ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★

★ ★ ★ тнαикѕ тσ тнє_иαмєℓєѕѕ_вαÑ∂ fÏƒÑ Ñ‚Ð½Î¹Ñ• αмαzιиg ѕιgиαтυÑÑ”! ★ ★ ★

★ ★ ★ тнαикѕ тσ тнє_иαмєℓєѕѕ_вαÑ∂ fÏƒÑ Ñ‚Ð½Î¹Ñ• αмαzιиg ѕιgиαтυÑÑ”! ★ ★ ★
You need to log in before commenting.
Also, we require 50 games to be played in order to qualify for verification. This takes a large portion of the "luck" out of it.