If I helped you out, be sure to throw me a +Rep!
-
My Soraka Guide | My Review Service

Thanks for the sig, MissMaw!
-
My Soraka Guide | My Review Service

Thanks for the sig, MissMaw!
It helps as an early pick as people will try to pick something to counter her top/mid,
Morgana's i've never had an issue with personally,
Lulu's Utility is superior (laning phase) and Q will almost always hit one of the two targets (if black shield is even used) and though i do rate
Thresh harder, i find when he grabs my adc, i can simply walk over and W their ADC for a duration longer than
Thresh's utility, and trade just as well due to an easy to land Q after (if i'm hit adc usually takes the time to throw in 1-2 auto attacks followed by the above to win the trade)
I believe
Nami does do
Lulu's job superior, and i do believe when i fight a
Nami player that is very competent with
Nami (I know Myself and most others are not the best with her) that i do lose overall on trades. I believe she should be a bit higher rated than
Zyra/
Karma though, I don't think i've ever lost to a
Zyra ever, most
Zyra players seem to overcast in lane for trading, and even though they do trade stronger, end up losing the early lane war very hard due to mana, and struggle to recover (and pix makes killing plants very easy, maybe a bit too easy)




I believe








Shh! I'm Charging My Laser.
^ I too find that
Lulu can compete with most supports botlane, plus her utility is very strong during all stages of the game.
Thresh and
Morgana require you to play similarly to the
Leona matchup where you don't expose yourself to the threat they present early and just help win with strong poke and by making their initiation useless overall, whereas
Nami can trade and heal (
Sona also used to be pretty nice against
Lulu also because of that, but no one plays her. I think
Sona/
Caitlyn lane was probably the strongest lane to play against any lulu lane, because they can poke and heal and you can't do much about it).
I think Lulu is good against initiators with no real sustain, but what makes her a "less optimal" support is because she is such a strong solo laner.









I think Lulu is good against initiators with no real sustain, but what makes her a "less optimal" support is because she is such a strong solo laner.

Cooper112 wrote:
Lulu support is great but its not tier 1 she fits top and mid much better atm. Nami is similar to her i think be better she is strong lane poke and healing unlike lulu.


FalseoGod wrote:

She i still better you dont put lee sin low because bronze-gold player play him badly or have low win rate people just dont know how abuse his power early.
I think lee has like over 50% win rate at challenger, Diamond but if you look overall he is only 46% rate because of lower elo's.
FalseoGod wrote:

After dorans blade nerf and 1v2 nerfs Nami got a huge boost in power because even though you might loose a trade, if you don't lose it too hard you can simply heal up and win lane anyway. Nami needs to watch out for ganks as even champs she counters (for example


I was born nude but now i am dude
If I helped you out, be sure to throw me a +Rep!
-
My Soraka Guide | My Review Service

Thanks a lot for the sig, jhoi! :)
-
My Soraka Guide | My Review Service

Thanks a lot for the sig, jhoi! :)
You need to log in before commenting.
If i recall correctly, lulu has a lot of trouble against morgana and thresh. I think that's really what's hindering her from being a nice support. Most tier 1 supports hax has listed only have 1 support that gives them a little bit of trouble. But morg and thresh really make lulu's life living hell if i recally correctly.
In addition to that, I think lulu is so frequently sought for by mid laners and top laners, that it's unusual for her to go bot