GrandmasterD wrote:
It's not about not fitting their body size or not, but more about them being fitting or not for their character and whatever it is they do.
does this mean that a female warrior has to have little breasts to be such? Or she shall not ever be a warrior cause she couldn't decide the size of her breasts? Ok, we are talking about invented and drawn women, but just to keep a little bit of irl logic, what you said(if i didnt missunderstand it) makes very little sense.
Bingo?

^i don't like the Christmas one honestly. I don't think they decide which champions to give skisn to based on how good they are. I mean,
Ashe has like 7 skins or something and she's one of the worst ADC (but then again she's popular for non 30s)

^i don't like the Christmas one honestly. I don't think they decide which champions to give skisn to based on how good they are. I mean,

Jack Rubino wrote:
does this mean that a female warrior has to have little breasts to be such? Or she shall not ever be a warrior cause she couldn't decide the size of her breasts? Ok, we are talking about invented and drawn women, but just to keep a little bit of irl logic, what you said(if i didnt missunderstand it) makes very little sense.
There's a big difference between breasts being little and not huge. Warriors, especially those in days of old who would wield swords, require a good amount of upper body strength. If one would train to improve that, then there's going to be less fat tissue, and breasts largely consist of that. As a result, female warriors should generally have smaller breasts than the average woman. The same is, of course, applicable to men yet less relevant.

jamespongebob wrote:

I guess I can agree with most, but the fact that we aren't allowed about how men are extremely sexualised is really stupid. I suppose that's just double standards but I think it's really fair to bring it up; although not as an argument, do not misunderstand me. The fact that men are sexualised doesn't mean women need to be as well, I just tend to bring that up because most people overlook it.

GrandmasterD wrote:
I guess I can agree with most, but the fact that we aren't allowed about how men are extremely sexualised is really stupid. I suppose that's just double standards but I think it's really fair to bring it up; although not as an argument, do not misunderstand me. The fact that men are sexualised doesn't mean women need to be as well, I just tend to bring that up because most people overlook it.
Tbh men are meant to be more of power fantasies than sexy. They're buff and stuff because people want to like that, and most times, it's not the same for women.
jamespongebob wrote:
Tbh men are meant to be more of power fantasies than sexy. They're buff and stuff because people want to like that, and most times, it's not the same for women.
Ofc and I get that. The same applies to the women. However, I have a problem once it starts to clash with the character design.



I do hate stereotypes and these perfect-looking characters but my annoyance goes beyond that. I mean, even with League's one-dimensional characters, they've managed to make their appearance contradict their - almost non-existent - personalities.







I want you to go find me anything other than a skinny sexy lady participating in any for of athletic event. Because that's what this is, A fictional athletic event. The people are running around all over the place, I don't even know how
Gragas keeps that shape he has and must have a RIDICULOUS calorie intake to maintain that level of fat.
Also "Skinny and Sexy" is a fairly broad term.

Also "Skinny and Sexy" is a fairly broad term.
You need to log in before commenting.
If she wants to have magical body curves, weapons, and attire, let her.
I'm not repeating myself.