Help?

[quote=Gunnarownsu]I am planning on making a guide, I plan on taking a week or so on each part so it is a great guide. But the problem is that there already is a good, up to date guide on every champion, let alone the ones i own. so which champion do you think needs a new guide?[/quote]

[quote=JEFFY40HANDS]Tough question. Answer......Whichever champ is your favorite, or the one you feel you know the most about :/[/quote]

[quote=Kazega]what makes a good guide isn't whether the material has been covered or not. It is on how it is presented and what new things are brought to the table with your guide. I saw an Annie buidl the other day that involved [[Shurelya's Reverie]]. it was weird, it was interestign, and I am pretty sure it would have worked if I tried it after reading the guide[/quote]

[quote=GrimmFate]Just make a champ on who you like the most or who you feel you know the best. I plan on making a Fiddles and a Brand guide IDC if there are already good guides up there :o Because I might pick up something they missed.[/quote]

[quote=Lugignaf]Agreeing with Jeffy here. See the Nasus guides? Yea. I made my jungle Nasus one and jhoi made hers. We're both in the top 10 now and there are far older guides.[/quote]

[quote=JEFFY40HANDS][quote=Kazega] what makes a good guide isn't whether the material has been covered or not. It is on how it is presented and what new things are brought to the table with your guide. I saw an Annie buidl the other day that involved [[Shurelya's Reverie]]. it was weird, it was interestign, and I am pretty sure it would have worked if I tried it after reading the guide [/quote] And that's where the problem lies. Most people give fuck all about information, all they want are the nice shiney pictures. Which is why a good number of top rated guides actually suck donkey dick. Their builds blow but they just explain everything oh so well. Guides need a combination of both, I don't want to compete for prettyness I'm looking for what works.[/quote]

[quote=Kazega][quote=JEFFY40HANDS] And that's where the problem lies. Most people give fuck all about information, all they want are the nice shiney pictures. Which is why a good number of top rated guides actually suck donkey dick. Their builds blow but they just explain everything oh so well. Guides need a combination of both, I don't want to compete for prettyness I'm looking for what works. [/quote] True: but why not have both?[/quote]

[quote=ZioSerpe]Look for a champ whoose top rated build differ from yours greatly. Right now Graves build are fail for example, if you think you can graves better go for it.[/quote]

[quote=DEWO]That question is kinda... wierd (this is a polite version of what i was going to say). You should make a guide on something you have a perfect knowledge about. Not who needs a guide... If your guide will be good it will be considered by ppl even if it is not the best on the site. Also if you keep your job good and update it frequently, add new ideas and correct stuff in it all the time it could be even better than the ones you already can read. And always new is better :P sort of since ppl like to read new innovative stuff. Instead of thinking too much go on and make a build on your fav champ and deal with it as it will always be one of the 75828252 guides around.[/quote]

[quote=Gunnarownsu]I am currently making an In depth guide to [[vayne]], since she is my favorite champion. The build will be very unusual but will work[/quote]