Klausenheim wrote:
Ahri nerf is miniscule. I'm fine with it.
A 22% increase at level 6 is miniscule?
Luther3000 wrote:
Because everyone buys a ton of AD on Warwick.
Ohwaitno.
It's a ****loads of loss of bonus dmg from ad, however since ulti aplies passive that's 48 bonus magic damage per strike, that is if, I recall WW's ulti correctly. Change might be done not to make it OP
Cho is MEGAZERGLING!
Snookemz wrote:
A 22% increase at level 6 is miniscule?
They didn't touch any of her AP Ratio's or passive. You are STILL going to get the kill at lvl 6 unless you play like a ******.
We'll see, but I stand by my opinion.
You can't peddle papooses with a dancing monkey.
Luther3000 wrote:
Because everyone buys a ton of AD on Warwick.
Ohwaitno.
Because they didn't buff his basic damage on ultimate right?
Ohwaitno.
Don't hate, it's too big a burden to bear.
Sigs made by: LaCorpse, jhoijhoi, Katoki, JEFFY40HANDS, The_Nameless_Bard and Sk1llbug
-||- Check out my Master Yi guide -||-
Support GP gg >.<
**** DIS ****!
**** DIS ****!
Ty MM and Blood for the sigs :3 | Rammus is comming back - heard it here first!
"Carrying"-guide | My reviewservice
"Carrying"-guide | My reviewservice
Zoki wrote:
Because they didn't buff his basic damage on ultimate right?
Ohwaitno.
I'm almost certain if we did the calculations including the new magic damage on his passive his ultimate would come back as doing about the same damage now as it used to, assuming minimal bonus AD.
man, that soraka nerf just rendered her useless. first they cut the nuts off her heal, now infuse. whats next? her ulti will only take those 5 feet from her and do 40% less healing? They think they are compensating by reducing the mana cost on starfall? yeah. thats what you want. A useless Soraka pushing a lane and starving her partner. sometimes I wonder if the people making these decisions even play the game.
You need to log in before commenting.
Changes sound like a nice buff for lanewick.
Still think his jungling will remain super slow.