Warwick NEEDS to jungle?

[quote=ExamplePrime]Warwick doesn't need to jungle at all Me and my mate used to do a Warwick/Rammus combo duo lane Worked shockingly well[/quote]

[quote=Zeprido][quote=B-Wong] No he doesn't NEED to but if you're not jungling with him you're using him ineffectively. [/quote] This is not true at all, he is a very strong laner and as long lane presence due to his lifesteal. Playstyle would determine your effectiveness, not whether or not you are jungling.[/quote]

[quote=Jebus McAzn][quote=Jebus McAzn] Tbh he's not a terrible laner. He's good harass and survivability with his Q, IAS with his W, fairly useless E but a ballin' ultimate. But he's such a fantastic jungler and such a great ganker coming out of the jungle that you're wasting a lot by not jungling with him. He can counter-jungle and has one of the fastest and most reliable neutral creep clears in the game. He leaves the jungle at very high health and can take multiple possible starting routes, meaning that it's hard for your opponents to predict where you are at any given time. So I wouldn't say that you're playing Warwick ineffectively as a laner - I'd say that you're wasting his potential. [/quote] ^See this.[/quote]

[quote=DEWO]solomid ww based on his Q-W is quite effective. Other than that, double lane WW is just "stealing exp" in my eyes.[/quote]

[quote=ExamplePrime]I think its silly saying that Warwick MUST be played in the Jungle because he isn't actually the best jungler Just the one who did it first[/quote]