GrandmasterD wrote:
that loathsome **** of a Jar Jar is in every single movie!
Awww, now you're being too mean. Jar Jar is kind of cute, in the way a ******ed dog tilting its head and looking at you while peeing on your couch is.
Bludes wrote:
It's about Battlefield just having plain bad dialogues and no innovation making it one of the worst movies I've ever seen (regarding it cost more than 40 million dollars).
Star Wars is far more catching and somehow iconic.
Star Wars is just really good from a storytelling and character perspective. If you haven't watched these reviews yet, I suggest you do. They are fun and really show off some stuff you probably didn't think about yourself; should help virtually everyone understand Star Wars more, imo.
GrandmasterD wrote:
I did not get that at all from his phrasing; I really don't know anything about that movie. Thinking again, that should've tipped me off.
I got that.
It wasn't entirely clear until I did a google search though..
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Battlefield+Earth
YOWIE, those scores.
Google has a job title called "Head of Black Community Engagement"..
I don't know whether to cry or laugh.. or both.
I don't know whether to cry or laugh.. or both.
Searz wrote:
I got that.
It wasn't entirely clear until I did a google search though..
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Battlefield+Earth
YOWIE, those scores.
Thanks for googling that for me, the film seems ghastly. Not as terrible as Sharknado but then again, it didn't have quite the same budget. Superbabies, however, yeah I don't know what prompted the idea for a sequel.
You need to log in before commenting.
I did not get that at all from his phrasing; I really don't know anything about that movie. Thinking again, that should've tipped me off.
It's about Battlefield just having plain bad dialogues and no innovation making it one of the worst movies I've ever seen (regarding it cost more than 40 million dollars).
Star Wars is far more catching and somehow iconic.