Kurt_Ottman wrote:
I'm glad as long as people think Warwick is a bad ganker, that makes everything so much easier :)
WW can not punish over extension, you can just run away from WW.
If you have your ultimate up, you can perform decent ganks on lanes with a high amount of burst.
If you do not have your ultimate, you can not effectively punish someone for overextension, your lane presence is extremely weak.
Because of this, warwick is a bad ganker.
Tri lane for life.
Just give me one reason why Warwick is good at ganks pre-6.
One reason that doesn't apply to other junglers.
You can't do it.
One reason that doesn't apply to other junglers.
You can't do it.
Woohoo, the extremely easy to use, boring and incredibly effective with the least amount of effort post 6 ganker is back on the market. Great, hang on.. why is this good news? Should of gotten a complete revamp.
If I helped +Rep, if I didn't then +Rep the person who did.
Zell wrote:
Woohoo, the extremely easy to use, boring and incredibly effective with the least amount of effort post 6 ganker is back on the market. Great, hang on.. why is this good news? Should of gotten a complete revamp.
He's broken as ****. His jungle isn't even part of what makes him good. If you build a wriggles and spirit visage on him he just doesn't die unless they have ignite. I've played like 5 games this patch with Warwick and each of them I've done ridiculous 2v1s and 3v1s that I shouldn't be able to do.
Wintermond
<Member>
<Member>
You need to log in before commenting.
Well, I gank with Warwick at level 3 in ranked games, and they DO have a ward.
No offence but they must be legitimately terrible players.
If you have a ward there's absolutely zero threat from Warwick ganks, you can simply stroll away. Hell, you don't even need to back away from farm unless you're low health as long as you stay out of the range of his autoattack and your lane opponent's CC.