SHILLARY OR DRUMPF?
Jovy
<Admin>
<Admin>
I'm honestly no longer sure who would be worse. On the one hand, she seems way more experienced and capable to do the job (whereas I still feel Trump doesn't truly understand most of the issues he'll be facing), on the other she wants to enforce a no-fly zone over Syria, which could lead to war. That doesn't sound great either.
Quoted:
i sense some bias here
so how much does correct the record pay?
I AM NOT AFFECTED BY ELOHELL. NOOBS AND TROLLS NEVER RUIN MY RANKED GAMES.
I DON'T GET STUCK AND I NEVER GET ONLY 2LP FOR A WIN.
I AM UNRANKED.
also check out my Ryze guide
Yay a Hillary vs Trump ****fest, a clown vs a puppet kek
Hillary says anything to become president, probs doesn't give a **** about anything as long as she keeps the position.
Everything Trump does on the other hand feels like a joke rather than anything else.
I feel sorry for you murica, if only your elections were less entertainment and more like actual elections, third parties would've also had a chance.
Hillary says anything to become president, probs doesn't give a **** about anything as long as she keeps the position.
Everything Trump does on the other hand feels like a joke rather than anything else.
I feel sorry for you murica, if only your elections were less entertainment and more like actual elections, third parties would've also had a chance.
Change is gooooood
Picture by: My valentine; jamespongebob <3
Want to advertise your guide, but don't know where? Click here for an opportunity of a lifetime!
Wayne3100 wrote:
on the other she wants to enforce a no-fly zone over Syria, which could lead to war. That doesn't sound great either.
Gotta git dat sweet dough from the "defense" industry.
Maaaan, this whole election is just a ****ing farce. I think this perfectly illustrates the issue with a two-candiate system like this. In countries with multi-party systems there's at least options if a few of the candidates (parties) seem ****. There's also a non-zero chance of smaller parties gaining traction and growing.
"I sexually Identify as an Attack Helicopter. Ever since I was a boy I dreamed of soaring over the oilfields dropping hot sticky loads on disgusting foreigners. People say to me that a person being a helicopter is Impossible and I’m ****ing ******ed but I don’t care, I’m beautiful. I’m having a plastic surgeon install rotary blades, 30 mm cannons and AMG-114 Hellfire missiles on my body. From now on I want you guys to call me “Apache†and respect my right to kill from above and kill needlessly. If you can’t accept me you’re a heliphobe and need to check your vehicle privilege. Thank you for being so understanding." - Guuse
"uh, I identify as counterstrike and I find this globally offensive" - ???
"uh, I identify as counterstrike and I find this globally offensive" - ???
remember to vote, but I really feel this is what the election/voting has turned into.
sig by idmb22 ♥
You need to log in before commenting.
So in my opinion both candidates are ****. Either party could have nominated literally anyone else and they would be getting like 80%. I honestly believe that if one of the parties would have nominated a monkey, they would be winning just to keep the other candidate out of office.
I am not completly sure whom I would vote for if I had to, but I think it would be a reluctant vote for trump. I don't really agree with anything he says and have a pretty low opinion of him, but I couldn't vote for Hillery because she and/or her staff are ridicoulusly corrupt and incredibly stupid in terms of anything remotely related to the internet and computers.