Free
On Sale
Strong
Popular
SHILLARY OR DRUMPF?
I'm honestly no longer sure who would be worse. On the one hand, she seems way more experienced and capable to do the job (whereas I still feel Trump doesn't truly understand most of the issues he'll be facing), on the other she wants to enforce a no-fly zone over Syria, which could lead to war. That doesn't sound great either.
Yay a Hillary vs Trump ****fest, a clown vs a puppet kek
Hillary says anything to become president, probs doesn't give a **** about anything as long as she keeps the position.
Everything Trump does on the other hand feels like a joke rather than anything else.
I feel sorry for you murica, if only your elections were less entertainment and more like actual elections, third parties would've also had a chance.
Hillary says anything to become president, probs doesn't give a **** about anything as long as she keeps the position.
Everything Trump does on the other hand feels like a joke rather than anything else.
I feel sorry for you murica, if only your elections were less entertainment and more like actual elections, third parties would've also had a chance.
Change is gooooood
Picture by: Hogopogo
Want to advertise your guide, but don't know where? Click here for an opportunity of a lifetime!
Wayne3100 wrote:
on the other she wants to enforce a no-fly zone over Syria, which could lead to war. That doesn't sound great either.
Gotta git dat sweet dough from the "defense" industry.
Maaaan, this whole election is just a ****ing farce. I think this perfectly illustrates the issue with a two-candiate system like this. In countries with multi-party systems there's at least options if a few of the candidates (parties) seem ****. There's also a non-zero chance of smaller parties gaining traction and growing.
"That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence." - Christopher Hitchens
You need to log in before commenting.
So in my opinion both candidates are ****. Either party could have nominated literally anyone else and they would be getting like 80%. I honestly believe that if one of the parties would have nominated a monkey, they would be winning just to keep the other candidate out of office.
I am not completly sure whom I would vote for if I had to, but I think it would be a reluctant vote for trump. I don't really agree with anything he says and have a pretty low opinion of him, but I couldn't vote for Hillery because she and/or her staff are ridicoulusly corrupt and incredibly stupid in terms of anything remotely related to the internet and computers.