SHILLARY OR DRUMPF?
I'm honestly no longer sure who would be worse. On the one hand, she seems way more experienced and capable to do the job (whereas I still feel Trump doesn't truly understand most of the issues he'll be facing), on the other she wants to enforce a no-fly zone over Syria, which could lead to war. That doesn't sound great either.
Thanks to MissMaw for the signature!
Yay a Hillary vs Trump ****fest, a clown vs a puppet kek
Hillary says anything to become president, probs doesn't give a **** about anything as long as she keeps the position.
Everything Trump does on the other hand feels like a joke rather than anything else.
I feel sorry for you murica, if only your elections were less entertainment and more like actual elections, third parties would've also had a chance.
Hillary says anything to become president, probs doesn't give a **** about anything as long as she keeps the position.
Everything Trump does on the other hand feels like a joke rather than anything else.
I feel sorry for you murica, if only your elections were less entertainment and more like actual elections, third parties would've also had a chance.
Change is gooooood
Want to advertise your guide, but don't know where? Click here for an opportunity of a lifetime!
Wayne3100 wrote:
on the other she wants to enforce a no-fly zone over Syria, which could lead to war. That doesn't sound great either.
Gotta git dat sweet dough from the "defense" industry.
Maaaan, this whole election is just a ****ing farce. I think this perfectly illustrates the issue with a two-candiate system like this. In countries with multi-party systems there's at least options if a few of the candidates (parties) seem ****. There's also a non-zero chance of smaller parties gaining traction and growing.
"We've had a few gloomy years with bad console ports, and what do we get in the light at the end of the console-tunnel? A tablet OS ported to PC." - Atlas Tasume, on Windows 8
You need to log in before commenting.
So in my opinion both candidates are ****. Either party could have nominated literally anyone else and they would be getting like 80%. I honestly believe that if one of the parties would have nominated a monkey, they would be winning just to keep the other candidate out of office.
I am not completly sure whom I would vote for if I had to, but I think it would be a reluctant vote for trump. I don't really agree with anything he says and have a pretty low opinion of him, but I couldn't vote for Hillery because she and/or her staff are ridicoulusly corrupt and incredibly stupid in terms of anything remotely related to the internet and computers.