Thanks to TRUeLM, Plastictree, Scrax, Xiaowiriamu, foggy12, JahGFX, jhoijhoi, msrobinson, JEFFY40HANDS, Nyoike, MissMaw, and me :) for the sigs!
Oh dude... You vote him up?... Not only is the build and guide bad, but he's also a guy who has been breaking rules earlier (spamming and some other stuff I think) and I wouldn't be surprised if he actually is using loads of new accounts..
Google has a job title called "Head of Black Community Engagement"..
I don't know whether to cry or laugh.. or both.
I don't know whether to cry or laugh.. or both.
Lol I just did to see if he would respond
I was bored...ok? XD
I removed vote, DW
I was bored...ok? XD
I removed vote, DW
Thanks to TRUeLM, Plastictree, Scrax, Xiaowiriamu, foggy12, JahGFX, jhoijhoi, msrobinson, JEFFY40HANDS, Nyoike, MissMaw, and me :) for the sigs!
wRAthoFVuLK wrote:
I think the build is not half bad, however, seeing the time and effort put into it, for it to rise in score that quickly, for all the upvotes to be quick, concise "good builds", and for 3 or 4 of the voters to join today and only vote on that build...
and also considering the author is someone who has been seen around the site constantly trolling (ie -1 bad guide is bad, -1 pie, etc)
I think this should be looked into.
Searz wrote:
a guy who has been breaking rules earlier (spamming and some other stuff I think) and I wouldn't be surprised if he actually is using loads of new accounts..
I'm not saying you are wrong, Matt, as you may indeed be correct.
However, there is a lot of "abstract" evidence that this is foul play, and it wouldn't hurt to check...
if you don't, however, I totally understand why.
EDIT: lol wtf, it's gone.
o-o
Bloofyre wrote:
May a squadron of beautiful vaginas find their way to your crotch by day's end.
Thanks to TRUeLM, Plastictree, Scrax, Xiaowiriamu, foggy12, JahGFX, jhoijhoi, msrobinson, JEFFY40HANDS, Nyoike, MissMaw, and me :) for the sigs!
I checked the accounts of all the voters on that build. They are not sharing same IPs or anything similar. Maybe they are all friends, but there's no way to prove that and even if they are, I'm sure your friends have voted on your guides, is that cheating?
If the build sucks, people will vote as such and it will eventually drop.
If the build sucks, people will vote as such and it will eventually drop.
alright, understood
glad you checked however.
it'll get in its place soon enough :P
glad you checked however.
it'll get in its place soon enough :P
Thanks to TRUeLM, Plastictree, Scrax, Xiaowiriamu, foggy12, JahGFX, jhoijhoi, msrobinson, JEFFY40HANDS, Nyoike, MissMaw, and me :) for the sigs!
Yes, it will. Let's all help it on the way ;)
"Moral justification is a powerful disengagement mechanism. Destructive conduct is made personally and socially acceptable by portraying it in the service of moral ends." - Albert Bandura
"Ultimately, if people lose their willingness to recognize that there are times in our history when legality becomes distinct from morality, we aren't just ceding control of our rights to government, but our futures." - Edward Snowden
"Ultimately, if people lose their willingness to recognize that there are times in our history when legality becomes distinct from morality, we aren't just ceding control of our rights to government, but our futures." - Edward Snowden
anyone notice it disappear from the front page?
Thanks to TRUeLM, Plastictree, Scrax, Xiaowiriamu, foggy12, JahGFX, jhoijhoi, msrobinson, JEFFY40HANDS, Nyoike, MissMaw, and me :) for the sigs!
You need to log in before commenting.
I think the build is not half bad, however, seeing the time and effort put into it, for it to rise in score that quickly, for all the upvotes to be quick, concise "good builds", and for 3 or 4 of the voters to join today and only vote on that build...
and also considering the author is someone who has been seen around the site constantly trolling (ie -1 bad guide is bad, -1 pie, etc)
I think this should be looked into.
Thanks!