^ya
Thanks to TRUeLM, Plastictree, Scrax, Xiaowiriamu, foggy12, JahGFX, jhoijhoi, msrobinson, JEFFY40HANDS, Nyoike, MissMaw, and me :) for the sigs!
No, I think it's additive. But that it's 35%+4*15%=95% instead of 5*15%. Because it slows FURTHER each second. Please correct me if you can find the facts tho.
95% slow might seem OP, but after about 240 (or something like that) slows are reduced in effectiveness by 20% and after 200 (or so) they're reduced by 50%.
95% slow might seem OP, but after about 240 (or something like that) slows are reduced in effectiveness by 20% and after 200 (or so) they're reduced by 50%.
Sittin' on chimneys, putting fire up my ***.
"I biked 12km in a blizzard today and mice are chewing on my chocolate bars. Life's good."
"I biked 12km in a blizzard today and mice are chewing on my chocolate bars. Life's good."
Hershyy wrote:
It doesn't go to a "negative slow". It would go initial value- 35% then continually take off 15% each second. Just think of each second as a new math equation subtracting from the previous one.
Like I said, that's probably NOT the case..
Please read the entire thread before posting..
"every now and again you come across a game that has so little emotional connection to who you are that you end up standing there, gazing at the screen and saying "I'm just pressing buttons and my life has no meaning,"" - Colin Campbell
You need to log in before commenting.
Does that mean they move backwards?? Is it a stun?
Let me spell it out.
35% base slow
15% per second
15 x 5 = 75
75 + 35 = 110%
That's messed up.
I'd like to see it fixed, so I can know the actual numbers on it