Luther3000 wrote:
Actually there was a thread in off-topic about it around a month ago I think. If I remember rightly it went to around 4 or 5 pages.
for all 96 people that read the off-topic forums
Thanks for the Signature MissMaw!
Phoenix0000ff wrote:
Put all the pirates out of hobbies and jobs and what you think is going to happen?
It's not going to be like a Disney movie.
Wait...
I thought that making pirating MORE challenging was a GOOD thing for pirates.
More prestige, more fun.
Tri lane for life.
Mooninites wrote:
for all 96 people that read the off-topic forums
Honestly, SOPA wasn't "on topic" before now.
So shut the **** up with your "No one cared till now!" ********.
Tri lane for life.
Mooninites wrote:
for all 96 people that read the off-topic forums
for anyone not named mooninites, pulling a BS statistic out of your *** would be a dumb way to make an argument.
If I had a post for every time you've said something stupid on Mobafire, I would have 264 more posts...
Nighthawk wrote:
for anyone not named mooninites, pulling a BS statistic out of your *** would be a dumb way to make an argument.
If I had a post for every time you've said something stupid on Mobafire, I would have 264 more posts...
gee wizz I thought everyone on Mobafire hated trolls. inb4biased
Thanks for the Signature MissMaw!
Mooninites wrote:
gee wizz I thought everyone on Mobafire hated trolls. inb4biased
Way to go downvote my guide because of personal opinion bro!
You must feel really special!
I've always found Lifehacker to be a useful source of information, and they prove no different on what SOPA means for us. Wikipedia also has useful information, and it's less biased than most websites. A lot about the bill concerns me, but in particular the following (from Wikipedia):
Think it would be that harsh just to be a deterrent? Think about all the multi-million lawsuits that the RIAA and MPAA filed against regular citizens.
I'm also not the only one that says SOPA will be the end of the Internet as we know it. Lots of other people think so too.
Quoted:
The bill would make unauthorized streaming of copyrighted content a crime, with a maximum penalty of five years in prison for 10 such infringements within six months.
Think it would be that harsh just to be a deterrent? Think about all the multi-million lawsuits that the RIAA and MPAA filed against regular citizens.
I'm also not the only one that says SOPA will be the end of the Internet as we know it. Lots of other people think so too.
Anandre wrote:
I've always found Lifehacker to be a useful source of information, and they prove no different on what SOPA means for us. Wikipedia also has useful information, and it's less biased than most websites. A lot about the bill concerns me, but in particular the following (from Wikipedia):
Think it would be that harsh just to be a deterrent? Think about all the multi-million lawsuits that the RIAA and MPAA filed against regular citizens.
I'm also not the only one that says SOPA will be the end of the Internet as we know it. Lots of other people think so too.
First things first, Wikipedia is not a credible source, it is extremely biased because one person writes article, even with revisions. The person could even be joe-schmo. I never said I supported the bill, but all these sheeple going around acting like it's the end of the world is nonsense
Thanks for the Signature MissMaw!
You need to log in before commenting.



It's not going to be like a Disney movie.