Nighthawk wrote:
for anyone not named mooninites, pulling a BS statistic out of your *** would be a dumb way to make an argument.
If I had a post for every time you've said something stupid on Mobafire, I would have 264 more posts...
gee wizz I thought everyone on Mobafire hated trolls. inb4biased
Thanks for the Signature MissMaw!
Mooninites wrote:
gee wizz I thought everyone on Mobafire hated trolls. inb4biased
Way to go downvote my guide because of personal opinion bro!
You must feel really special!
Anandre
<Member>
<Member>
I've always found Lifehacker to be a useful source of information, and they prove no different on what SOPA means for us. Wikipedia also has useful information, and it's less biased than most websites. A lot about the bill concerns me, but in particular the following (from Wikipedia):
Think it would be that harsh just to be a deterrent? Think about all the multi-million lawsuits that the RIAA and MPAA filed against regular citizens.
I'm also not the only one that says SOPA will be the end of the Internet as we know it. Lots of other people think so too.
Quoted:
The bill would make unauthorized streaming of copyrighted content a crime, with a maximum penalty of five years in prison for 10 such infringements within six months.
Think it would be that harsh just to be a deterrent? Think about all the multi-million lawsuits that the RIAA and MPAA filed against regular citizens.
I'm also not the only one that says SOPA will be the end of the Internet as we know it. Lots of other people think so too.
Rozsud3k
<Member>
<Member>
Anandre wrote:
I've always found Lifehacker to be a useful source of information, and they prove no different on what SOPA means for us. Wikipedia also has useful information, and it's less biased than most websites. A lot about the bill concerns me, but in particular the following (from Wikipedia):
Think it would be that harsh just to be a deterrent? Think about all the multi-million lawsuits that the RIAA and MPAA filed against regular citizens.
I'm also not the only one that says SOPA will be the end of the Internet as we know it. Lots of other people think so too.
First things first, Wikipedia is not a credible source, it is extremely biased because one person writes article, even with revisions. The person could even be joe-schmo. I never said I supported the bill, but all these sheeple going around acting like it's the end of the world is nonsense
Thanks for the Signature MissMaw!
Nighthawk wrote:
Way to go downvote my guide because of personal opinion bro!
You must feel really special!
I actually checked out your profile, to be reminded of who you are again, anyway voting for your guide was the result of me checking out your profile and your guide. I realize that humor is something you have to really try for but you didn't quite cut it in your guide. Also it was pretty ridiculously written, I can't believe you actually expect people to take it seriously.
back on topic
Thanks for the Signature MissMaw!
Mooninites wrote:
I actually checked out your profile, to be reminded of who you are again, anyway voting for your guide was the result of me checking out your profile and your guide. I realize that humor is something you have to really try for but you didn't quite cut it in your guide. Also it was pretty ridiculously written, I can't believe you actually expect people to take it seriously.
back on topic
Sorry all I read in your post was
>Personal Dig since I pride myself on being relatively well known on Mobafire
>Personal dig about humour since I did inject a bit of humour into that guide
>semi constructive criticism about my writing style
So i'll respond to number 3 since it's 'semi' constructive at least. My writing style is fine the way I like it, we've already been over the topic but i'll inject a bit of 'doesn't matter whether guide is formatted like a boss or bare as a bone, it's the build that matters' in here, but just a little since I only semi agree with that.
Wait, was I actually taking you seriously? Oh right my bad, I forgot that you were an ******* who from day 1 has been making stupid comments on guides and making even more stupid comments to members, especially recently where you went from 'annoying pest' to 'full blown ******'.
Anandre
<Member>
<Member>
Mooninites wrote:
First things first, Wikipedia is not a credible source, it is extremely biased because one person writes article, even with revisions. The person could even be joe-schmo. I never said I supported the bill, but all these sheeple going around acting like it's the end of the world is nonsense
Tip: saying "sheeple" doesn't make you cool and your argument correct. Ask anyone who knows something about SOPA, and 99% of the responses will be negative about it, the other 1% naturally belonging to the media, who's backing this like no tomorrow. SOPA is not good for the Internet's health.
Besides, you just cherry-picked the fact that I used Wikipedia and completely ignored the rest of my argument. What I said still stands, and even if you don't want to paraphrase it from Wikipedia, go look at the full text of the bill and see what it says. Here's a link to the text of the bill for your perusal.
Edit: also, Wikipedia itself is not in favor of SOPA. It either moved from GoDaddy because of GD's support of SOPA or threatened to, I can't remember which. While it hasn't explicitly stated how it feels on SOPA, that action or intent clearly shows where Wikipedia stands on the matter. Despite that, articles on the website itself can still be remarkably unbiased and have useful information. Bashing on Wikipedia might be the cool thing to do, but it still has its uses.
You need to log in before commenting.
for all 96 people that read the off-topic forums
for anyone not named mooninites, pulling a BS statistic out of your *** would be a dumb way to make an argument.
If I had a post for every time you've said something stupid on Mobafire, I would have 264 more posts...