BUT IF YOU SET UP 2 OF THEM
(that could seriously work, lol. If they make the software support it)
Or they could just make one with increased range.
(that could seriously work, lol. If they make the software support it)
Or they could just make one with increased range.
"I love the dirty bomb tag because i get either
a) posts about the game
b) current world affairs" - steel-sentry
a) posts about the game
b) current world affairs" - steel-sentry
That's exactly the problem... the tech they're showing only works so well, because they track stuff at a very short distance in a very limited area.
Imagine the same tracking on the WHOLE body at least 2m away from the tracking device.
Lags and/or slow as **** overall.
If you want the same thing on the area Kinect supports, you'll waste one hell of money.
Imagine the same tracking on the WHOLE body at least 2m away from the tracking device.
Lags and/or slow as **** overall.
If you want the same thing on the area Kinect supports, you'll waste one hell of money.
The main thing about motion control for me is that it HAS to be exact. Otherwise gaming will be a pain in the arse at times. Kinect is rubbish in that respect, and Wii isn't quite good either.
Even though this Leap Motion has it's limitations, it's very precise and that's a requirement for implementing it into games.
Even though this Leap Motion has it's limitations, it's very precise and that's a requirement for implementing it into games.
"Games may not be art, but this one did wonderful things to my ****." - Roger Ebert
"I AM PRETTY SURE THIS MANGA IS VIOLATING SOME LAWS ABOUT CHILD PORNOGRAPHY
I CANNOT GET ENOUGH
****" - mencretnas, on Gigantomakhia
"I AM PRETTY SURE THIS MANGA IS VIOLATING SOME LAWS ABOUT CHILD PORNOGRAPHY
I CANNOT GET ENOUGH
****" - mencretnas, on Gigantomakhia
Darcurse wrote:
Yeah, but the other requirement (range/area) isnt given unless you reduce that precision...
Not really, but it'll require more processing power and potentially more expensive sensors.
Honestly, precision is way more important than range/area..
"We've had a few gloomy years with bad console ports, and what do we get in the light at the end of the console-tunnel? A tablet OS ported to PC." - Atlas Tasume, on Windows 8
Searz wrote:
Honestly, precision is way more important than range/area..
I disagree. This has much more precision than you need for console games. Why the hell do you want to track the finger movements? This is completely useless for gaming.
You need to log in before commenting.


Looks cool :o
Costs 70$ (30$ less than Kinec, lol) and is released in February 2013.