Rage Votes

[quote=Jebus McAzn]Actually, no. You shouldn't downvote someone else's builds for revenge or out of retaliation - you want to be the bigger person and just take the troll vote. If he is really trolling, he'll know that he pissed you off and that your -1 is just because of something that he did. Then after that, he might even continue to downvote all your upcoming builds, just because he'll know that he's gotten to you. I'm not exactly one to lecture people on morality issues, but if you just don't respond to trolls like that, they'll actually leave you alone after a while. As Six said, a guide that deserves upvotes will eventually get to the rating it needs to be at.[/quote]

[quote=Kaszanas]So when we are at this stage, can you tell me if my guide have some chance to get some more (non-troll votes) That's not advertising im don't telling you to vote ! just check and tell me.[/quote]

[quote=Jebus McAzn]From a totally unbiased point of view, I'm going to examine what's going on. Your side: -You downvoted his build. He then downvoted yours, giving no argument at all. -On his build comments, he did say that he believed that your builds were bad, and that's why he gave you -1. -His downvote was probably only caused by your first downvote, leading you to believe that it was out of spite and not actually because he didn't like the build. His side: -Your -1 had faulty reasoning in the first place. -Your arguments didn't make much sense and didn't have much information aside from "I don't think Warmog's is good". Frankly, I think that while he shouldn't have -1'd in the first place, your own downvote needs more reasoning. Don't just say "I think Warmog's is bad on Sivir" - you need to say why Warmog's is bad on Sivir. Also, arguing that a champion is bad because she's 450 IP isn't a great argument either. Sivir's actually a top-tier champion, according to Elementz, and she performs very well in games behind a good player. You also mention that she carries no attack speed, even in the "additional items" section, when clearly Wit's End, Stark's Fervor, and The Black Cleaver all give AS. So I do believe that while GigaTV's -1 was wrong, you could have also put some better reasoning into your post. If your post is constructive, people usually won't retaliate against you. For example, see my earlier post on GigaTV's guide - that's an example of a post that helps a guide writer.[/quote]

[quote=React]React... reminds me of someone I know...[/quote]

[quote=Jebus McAzn][img=http://oi53.tinypic.com/2crjyq0.jpg] I'm sorry, but this made me lol really hard. It's like the tooltip is trying to be obvious. :P[/quote]

[quote=Kaszanas][quote=Jebus McAzn] From a totally unbiased point of view, I'm going to examine what's going on. Your side: -You downvoted his build. He then downvoted yours, giving no argument at all. -On his build comments, he did say that he believed that your builds were bad, and that's why he gave you -1. -His downvote was probably only caused by your first downvote, leading you to believe that it was out of spite and not actually because he didn't like the build. His side: -Your -1 had faulty reasoning in the first place. -Your arguments didn't make much sense and didn't have much information aside from "I don't think Warmog's is good". Frankly, I think that while he shouldn't have -1'd in the first place, your own downvote needs more reasoning. Don't just say "I think Warmog's is bad on Sivir" - you need to say why Warmog's is bad on Sivir. Also, arguing that a champion is bad because she's 450 IP isn't a great argument either. Sivir's actually a top-tier champion, according to Elementz, and she performs very well in games behind a good player. You also mention that she carries no attack speed, even in the "additional items" section, when clearly Wit's End, Stark's Fervor, and The Black Cleaver all give AS. So I do believe that while GigaTV's -1 was wrong, you could have also put some better reasoning into your post. If your post is constructive, people usually won't retaliate against you. For example, see my earlier post on GigaTV's guide - that's an example of a post that helps a guide writer. [/quote] Anyway i told him/her that the Warmog is bad so he/she should just look at the stats and match them with this Champ destination, but while i downvoted his Sivir he downvoted all of mine builds so this kind of sucks ... (Tip) check the suggestion of Riot about doing sivir i didn;t saw Warmog there[/quote]

[quote=Hell_Pet]Damn there should be a rule, use 5000 characters when you want to vote a build down. People must come with good reasons, those reasons are just trolling. I hate those people.[/quote]

[quote=B-Wong][quote=Hell_Pet] Damn there should be a rule, use 5000 characters when you want to vote a build down. People must come with good reasons, those reasons are just trolling. I hate those people. [/quote] There'd also have to be the same amount for upvotes then, to be fair.[/quote]

[quote=PotatisFarfar]Lock this tread already? it is kinda going no were now :S[/quote]

[quote=hypershatter]before it was random/troll voting from 12 year old kids. now admins done a wonderful job with the website and people still complain about the 1% of trolls that actually bother to leave a comment with downvote? i can understand restrictnine being pissed about people trolling his perfect votes but for anyone else really...[/quote]