I pick Vi over basically everyone (unless I can pick Caitlyn) because Vi is ****ing awesome.
I know that's not an argument. But I've done pretty good games with her, as well as pretty **** ones, but as long as I have fun with her (and believe me, I do) I don't care much.
I know that's not an argument. But I've done pretty good games with her, as well as pretty **** ones, but as long as I have fun with her (and believe me, I do) I don't care much.

+ sign by the-nameless-bard
Mooninites wrote:
WW can't really top lane, with the amount of health pots being chugged up there and the amount of sustain thats so easy to get, his top laning got hurt in s3.
I'll give you the clear speed and her ult. Warwick's ult is still good, and forces a QSS or Mikael's
Unless you're Irelia. That matchup is so stupid.... T.T
Also


Thanks to The_Nameless_Bard for the sig!
You need to log in before commenting.
Warwick sucks as a jungler lol, his ult is super easy to stop and while hes slightly tankier, Vi can do way more damage then him, clears jungle faster, duels better, has an unstoppable ult, has more cc overall, list goes on and on.
As for top lane warwick's lane phase is probably better, but warwick is a weird pick, and vi is a better jungler anyway.
WW can't really top lane, with the amount of health pots being chugged up there and the amount of sustain thats so easy to get, his top laning got hurt in s3.
I'll give you the clear speed and her ult. Warwick's ult is still good, and forces a QSS or Mikael's, it's also faster so easier to catch people out before they flash away (even if it doesn't break Vi's ult it can still put her in a horrible position). I agree that Vi has more damage, but WW becomes a beefy unkillable machine late game, I personally value that on a jungler