The_Nameless_Bard wrote:
the idea of playing Draven is to hard engage and snowball from lane. Soraka has extremely poor laning and she really doesn't provide much for all-in, that say Taric or Sona could provide. Hell, even Nami would provide more and provide sustain. I think both of these champions are pretty awful when paired together because they have totally different playstyles. Soraka is about surviving the lane and Draven is about winning the lane.
not to mention that Soraka is incredibly weak right now
Thanks for the Signature MissMaw!
Mooninites wrote:
the idea of playing Draven is to hard engage and snowball from lane. Soraka has extremely poor laning and she really doesn't provide much for all-in, that say Taric or Sona could provide. Hell, even Nami would provide more and provide sustain. I think both of these champions are pretty awful when paired together because they have totally different playstyles. Soraka is about surviving the lane and Draven is about winning the lane.
not to mention that Soraka is incredibly weak right now
My good sir, are you feeling a right bit slow in the head today?
*tips cap
Holy Toledo, Batman, It's Cho'Gath!
People jumping on moon now just for being moon? What he said was perfectly legitimate, well thought out, and logically sound. Yet people try to make ridiculous claims just to make him look bad. Soraka does not fit well with Draven. That's not easy to argue against. He is best with thresh, blitz, and leona. Trying to deny that for any reason is silly.
You need to log in before commenting.
On a more serious tandem, Miss Fortune+ Sona. MS, Armor, MR, damage, heals, Crescendo of the Bullet Time. Nuff said.