Heroes of the Storm - Blizzards version of...

[quote=Mooninites]Cinematic: [spoiler][embed=https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=0ecv0bT9DEo][/spoiler] Gameplay: [spoiler][embed=https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=f_fAkO3WOSY][/spoiler] Development/More Gameplay: [spoiler][embed=https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=EnhI_JotfcY][/spoiler] [img=http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3754/10751817833_8bf75cc1ba_b.jpg] What do people think? Serious contender to League of Legends or no?[/quote]

[quote=-NA- Veng Lmfao]It's Blizzard. They'll probably charge $60-70 for this, with ingame purchases still vital aswell. Although it looks cool, I'd like to think league will stay on top.[/quote]

[quote=GrandmasterD]It doesn't look new and shiny enough to beat League. People don't want a League clone with a few different features but an entirely different game and as far as I can see it, it doesn't seem that different.[/quote]

[quote=caucheka]^from a business point of view you can't share a cake, you have to take the other competitors slices. it won't jump into esports because its the most shitty casual game i have ever fucking seen of any of the already hundreds of ASSFAGGOTS titles. blizzard games have been shit since wotlk mounts are a stupid idea and they're already talking about skins before the game is even in beta. im sure they're going to keep mounts regardless though because mount skins more money money $$ there are no items either. it says right in the blizzard post 'more customization between talents or powers will be LOOKED at in the FUTURE' this game is going to crash and burn. just like hearthstone[/quote]

[quote=Toshabi][s]I'll give it a shot, but honestly, if it doesn't follow up the standard MOBA layout that DoTA spelled out so beautifully, I don't think it'll hold my interest for too long. I will, however, insta-buy the artbook.[/s] Actually, fuck what I said. I hope that their new playstyle for MOBAgames pays off with its originality. I have no clue how well it'd play out until I test it out, but I hope that this 'unique' route it's taking is fun, enjoyable and competitive. I dont mind shedding $60 for the game if it's good, but I don't want to join in on another blizzard subscription game. That will leave it dead to me. I will, sink or swim, instabuy the artbook. Blizzard art makes me hnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnng.[/quote]

[quote=Toshabi]Protip and fact: Caucheka is super duper, fun-sized biased when it comes to anything videogame related. He's still fun and lovable and hugable and I just wanna squeeze him so tight that he makes a goofy squeaky noise.[/quote]

[quote=caucheka]what i meant is that wotlk is where it started to go down, not after wotlk. i bought sc2 shortly after launch and i was a big fan of d2 so i watched every bit of d3 news and didn't even bat an eye to consider purchasing it. i played wow some back in bc and some in wotlk, and recently i decided to go back and sub for wow and its even worse than i remember the change from bc to wotlk. i assure you that my assumptions that it will be awful is justified. plus warlords and hearthstone don't look good either.[/quote]

[quote=Toshabi][quote=caucheka] what i meant is that wotlk is where it started to go down, not after. [/quote] WoW started to go downhill when it became subscription base.[/quote]

[quote=OTGBionicArm]Not gonna lie, the in game footage is pretty BA. I love the Blizzard characters even if i don't really like their games much.[/quote]

[quote=Toshabi]OTG I'll sign up for the beta if you sign up.[/quote]