ZeroSoulreaver
<Member>
<Member>
Uh do what now? I don't know what builds break the meta because really their are things that are viable and they just aren't popular. Still it doesn't mean it breaks the meta. I think the meta is more lenient than people give credit for.
Unless you just use something completely unreasonable...why would you want this? I don't knowwwwww!!!
Unless you just use something completely unreasonable...why would you want this? I don't knowwwwww!!!
-I'll ADC you l8er-
Useless conversations of what is meta and what is not.
If you think Karma doesn't fit in the meta, then it doesn't fit in.
If you think
Karma doesn't fit in the meta, then it doesn't fit in.
"A person giving you advice isn't perfect and has their own shortcomings but they may give you the piece that you're missing."
Embracing wrote:
Err.... there's a difference between going out of the meta and building differently o_o
i always thought meta referred to standard gameplay strategy? which is currently 1/1/2/1 (1 top 1 mid 2 bot 1 jg)
^this is what meta is. I don't think people know what the word means :s
"A person giving you advice isn't perfect and has their own shortcomings but they may give you the piece that you're missing."
Attack damage Malzahr, or MADzahar, if you will. Your voidlings gain the same amount of attack from runes/items/masteries as you do and they even have your armour penetration. It works surprisingly well as he will do a lot of magic (due to high spell base damage) and physical damage in addition to a %health spell, thus it's difficult to itemize against.
The sentence below this one is false.
The sentence above this one is true.
The sentence above this one is true.
You need to log in before commenting.
i always thought meta referred to standard gameplay strategy? which is currently 1/1/2/1 (1 top 1 mid 2 bot 1 jg)