I actually agree with the OP. 18/2 is much better than 80%. It'd also show the really "bad" top rated guides with 1500/500 - you can EASILY see that 1500 likes is good, but a guide with 500 DISLIKES must be bad.
I remember when it showed the upvotes out of total votes. People were getting a little hung up in the "I don't have 100% upvotes! Q_Q" instead of the "I have a guide that helps people. Yay!"
I don't prefer it either way tbh. As long as we have a consistent rating system, we're good in my eyes.
[quote=Lugignaf][quote=jhoijhoi]
I actually agree with the OP. 18/2 is much better than 80%. It'd also show the really "bad" top rated guides with 1500/500 - you can EASILY see that 1500 likes is good, but a guide with 500 DISLIKES must be bad.
[/quote]
I remember when it showed the upvotes out of total votes. People were getting a little hung up in the "I don't have 100% upvotes! Q_Q" instead of the "I have a guide that helps people. Yay!"
I don't prefer it either way tbh. As long as we have a consistent rating system, we're good in my eyes.[/quote]
Sig courtesy of GrandmasterD. Go get your own sig from them. :D
Totally agree that it should show likes vs dislikes
makes people more willing to try new guides rather than to always go for the toprated one
[quote=rival kaz]Totally agree that it should show likes vs dislikes
makes people more willing to try new guides rather than to always go for the toprated one[/quote]
I actually agree with the OP. 18/2 is much better than 80%. It'd also show the really "bad" top rated guides with 1500/500 - you can EASILY see that 1500 likes is good, but a guide with 500 DISLIKES must be bad.
I remember when it showed the upvotes out of total votes. People were getting a little hung up in the "I don't have 100% upvotes! Q_Q" instead of the "I have a guide that helps people. Yay!"
I don't prefer it either way tbh. As long as we have a consistent rating system, we're good in my eyes.