Personal habitual activites? Utilizing gargantuan idioms to fabricate intelligence.
"It's a colloquial shorthand that means the paradigm exists because of how the game works mechanically. Hence, "the Meta." Stop being a useless pedant." - PlayGooYa
"It's a colloquial shorthand that means the paradigm exists because of how the game works mechanically. Hence, "the Meta." Stop being a useless pedant." - PlayGooYa
You could also move the duo lane to mid, that way you would still be close to the dragon, have closer access to all lanes for the one lane that can actually spare one champ to go gank. Maybe have a strong lanepusher bot to counter the pushing power of an ad/support lane.
top: vlad, kennen, Teemo, varus maybe
Mid carry: Brand, Annie, Veigar, Cassi or any AD carry
Mid support: Leona, Blitz, Ali, Maokai, Taric
Bot: Nasus, Morgana, Mundo, Renekton
Jungle: ?
would be alot easier to double gank the sidelanes if the support keeps in the fog of war and bushes, and maybe even help the jungler invade
top: vlad, kennen, Teemo, varus maybe
Mid carry: Brand, Annie, Veigar, Cassi or any AD carry
Mid support: Leona, Blitz, Ali, Maokai, Taric
Bot: Nasus, Morgana, Mundo, Renekton
Jungle: ?
would be alot easier to double gank the sidelanes if the support keeps in the fog of war and bushes, and maybe even help the jungler invade
So, more like a roam...
Personal habitual activites? Utilizing gargantuan idioms to fabricate intelligence.
"It's a colloquial shorthand that means the paradigm exists because of how the game works mechanically. Hence, "the Meta." Stop being a useless pedant." - PlayGooYa
"It's a colloquial shorthand that means the paradigm exists because of how the game works mechanically. Hence, "the Meta." Stop being a useless pedant." - PlayGooYa
There is a few flaws to this strategy.First of all mages need levels more than ad so having a mage share a lane is bad.Secondly having too people top even just for 4 levels is bad because when one of the people leave the lane it will become a 1v1 and the person who was by himself would be a higher level letting him dominate easily.Don't change the meta just to change it.Change it because your strategy beats the meta
Razormaul wrote:
There is a few flaws to this strategy.First of all mages need levels more than ad so having a mage share a lane is bad.
I'm still not convinced that that's a particularly good argument against having an AP carry bottom lane with a support. Most of a mage's damage will come from the AP they get from items, right? So that argument pretty much falls flat for me.
You'll hit level 6 later though, so I kinda see how that might gimp you a bit in the early game. Are there any AP carries that don't need their ult for most of their damage? Ryze and Zilean, maybe?
The idea of this the more i think about it is bring back Alistar taric and blitzcrank that roam.
Basically 2 gankers jungler and support.
Support's "jungle" per say it a lane that needs help.
Ad can go bot but 2 v 1 they get shut down so hard. But ap's fair better such as Vlad and Ryze and kennen they can 2 v 1 fairly good enough if they have enough spell vamp or such.
Basically 2 gankers jungler and support.
Support's "jungle" per say it a lane that needs help.
Ad can go bot but 2 v 1 they get shut down so hard. But ap's fair better such as Vlad and Ryze and kennen they can 2 v 1 fairly good enough if they have enough spell vamp or such.
Hi. Thats it is all.
sure. could work. you just need some good communication.
Thank you jhoijhoi, Keondre, LaCorpse, The_Nameless_Bard, Arcana3, Apfeljack, Hogopogo, eddie199, Xiaowiriamu, and JEFFY40HANDS for the spectacular sigs!

You need to log in before commenting.
By the way, nice sig Couch.